Latest activity

The problem is, if you give me a two-year-old video of, say, a dot of light over the ocean that appears to show anomalous acceleration, what am I supposed to do with that as a researcher? I can't go back and set up sensors and there's no more...

But you preceded that with In other words, they reached no conclusion. They could not be "wrong in their conclusion". The items they studied remain unidentified. The reason for that could be any of the several reasons already discussed: perhaps...

My previous answer did not include the money, funding, element of the discussion. I'm ok with NASA studying UFOs, I'm not an American taxpayer.

That's the next stage for the skeptic. Unknown electrical phenomenon. Then it will have to be proven that they are acting under intelligent control. Determining where they are from might take the rest of one's life, if it ever could be...

I think some congresspeople and others know of specific videos they are trying to get released. I think many of them consider those so far to be pretty unconvincing. I think that’s what I’ve been hearing.

In some ways that reputation is a trap. If Villaroel were to publicly come out and announce that she had recanted her previously held opinions because she found the evidence did not support it, THEN the stigma would be coming from her previous...

On a more serious note, this is a thing I've noticed so far in this thread. Can we actually conclude that the only reason to further analyze the "anomalies" would be if they're intelligent? I mean, If I set up a sensor to find "things that do...

To me, it's not about disproving alien visitations or even claims that the US government knows all about them. That simply can't be done. It's about testing each piece of claimed evidence individually. I'm not religious, but I have no problem...

To me, it's not about disproving alien visitations or even claims that the US government knows all about them. That simply can't be done. It's about testing each piece of claimed evidence individually. I'm not religious, but I have no problem...

Basically, I agree with everything you're saying. The problem is not studying unidentified phenomena; it's studying phenomena for which there is no evidence of existence. And doing so because the "public" demand such studies. When people argue...

That is a good question. Some get the light show, some don’t.

Can we not? If you want to use such a query as the starting point for your reply, that's fine. But just pasting that stuff into the thread is a waste of space. I think the mainly relevant part to this was that scientific interest in the topic is...

You’re close minded. That was not a hole in the ground, it was an interdimensional portal! The aliens just thanked them later for returning the retrievals because they knew humans could not study those things in the 1800s.

I hear you, perfectly reasonable to conclude that.

They might want to start by turning their lights off at night, if they don't want to be detected... often said in jest, but I think it makes a valid point. If they are real, super advanced and do not want to be detected, why allow themselves to...