Latest activity

But is that nuance warranted? Better sensors simply move the LIZ further away so it actually gets bigger (in area: imagine a sphere doubling its size), not smaller.

But so many people are seeing the same kinds of leprechauns across decades. Now we have military and government folks talking about leprechauns. Have to address goblins and leprechauns wherever they pop up. Regardless of the reality of UFOs...

The cherry on top is the irony that the LIZs are now geometrically larger, so more things can and will fall into them - the more we can know the more we won't know. [* I'm reticent to suggest by which scaling factor. One could argue that it's...

You've seen a bit of what's been captured (some consider anomalous footage) and provided by the DoD, which is plausibly debunkable. And you've all done a good job with it. Folks who have seen more footage claim it is better than what's been...

You said: I understand it as "it's worth believing one might be red". A lot of things "have been said", including unicorns, fairies and leprechauns. Nothing is worth believing just because "it has been said".

This is totally off topic for this thread, however if an anecdote and a fuzzy photo is a "good example", can you provide the source for this so we can start a dedicated thread? There is no sense in debating the merits of this case, or others in...

Exactly! Better instruments don't really help. It doesn't matter how great our cameras are; the "anomalous stuff" will still be just out of reach.

Absolutely. If my sensor can clearly resolve a balloon at 1 mile, and balloons at 1.1 miles can be detected but not resolved (and so become UAP), I can build a better sensor and resolve balloons at 2 miles -- at which point balloons at 2.1 miles...

Exactly! Better instruments don't really help. It doesn't matter how great our cameras are; the "anomalous stuff" will still be just out of reach.

The problem is the UFOs can (and do) always just move into the gaps and low information zones of whatever sensors you have deployed. However at some point you sort of have to do a reset, you take all these reports and recordings from the past...

And at the same time the number of prosaic objects in the air at all ranges has, ahem, ballooned. More than 15,000 satellites in low earth orbit, including 10,400 Starlinks. (https://planet4589.org/space/stats/active.html) More than 44,000...

Person A: "America has an epidemic of (racial group X) assaulting & killing (racial group Y). Something must be done!" Person B: "Based on what?" Person A: "Here are 25 cases that absolutely prove it!!" Person B: "Okay, it took a while, but all...

It is more than stuff in sky like UFOs; UAP is defined as an anomalous phenomenon encountered in any Earth environment, including oceans.

Then you've misunderstood @jarlrmai's point and comitted a category error. He's not discussing individual cases to which light can be borne, he's discussing the class of all UAP reports: no matter how good a sensor is, there will always be a...

This is totally off topic for this thread, however if an anecdote and a fuzzy photo is a "good example", can you provide the source for this so we can start a dedicated thread? There is no sense in debating the merits of this case, or others in...