Latest activity

He's bigger on the inside!

Well it was only posted here 2/3 days after CITD so it missed that boat anyway.

Probqbly because we are using thevword "realistically" to name two different concepts. English does this to us from time to time!

I was thinking along the lines of artists like Ron Mueck (his work starts in the 1990s) who creates incredible hyperrealistic sculptures often at massive scale. Seen in person they are very powerful. Or there's Duane Hanson whose work preceeds...

It's also funny that one of the reasons they dismissed the 1st location was cars potentially interfering, yet they drove their truck up to the eventual viewing spot.

I missed this existed! Where can one acquire this app?

They also do not seemingly properly document anything so proving anything either way is hindered

Yes, that's been my experience. They know that SHF exist, but continue to think they are summoning things.

So now its working :confused:

It's a very new app, so probably not. I wish I'd thought to promote its use for CID. Maybe next time.

Don't exaggerate. The situation regarding UFOs has not "exploded" during my lifetime, and many of the phenomena that have been observed and mistaken for aliens are now better understood than ever. People have been making sci-fi movies since...

I'm sure we'd all agree that proof that a UFO was in fact an ETI artefact would be enormously scientifically important. It would be of great interest to many people. Many astronomers etc. would probably have to revise their views. Many textbooks...

See? Black boxes all around. Can be a bird, but is this answer definitive? I’m gonna change my opinion, what Nourali highlighted is most likely the reason why somebody thought of these objects that they were going in and out of water. Of course...

Try again and then do Help->Export Debug Log, this should give you a file. Attach it here or DM it to me.

Like which ones? What would constitute "more transparency"? What evidence can be giving showing there is not an UFO/alien program? If there is no program, then there is no evidence to show there isn't. It's trying to prove a negative. When...