Latest activity

They also seem to have discarded this radar data at a later date, so this 'formal confirmation' can't be examined in detail. We are relying on human memories and second-hand accounts.

When investigating the Chilean case, there were many scientists and government officials who didn't understand what they were looking at. Kosloski saying that there are cases he and his colleagues "do not understand" doesn't mean they are...

And even the more or less scientific research institutes and initiatives established by ufologists themselves have so far produced nothing that would amount to significant evidence for exotic events. Time and again, it all boils down to hearsay...

The "random garbage" is what people who think they've seen something anomalous have dropped *onto* AARO. Blame the source, not the mediator.

The "Amaco alien" is clearly an attempt at hyperrealism, otherwise why not use a cartoon or impressionistic painting? I don't know why you'd stand by the argument: "you can't say this is a realistic depiction of an alien without a real alien to...

If we're going back, let's go WAY back! It is only "real looking" if there is a real thing that looks like that, which has not been proven and can't be proven by pointing to this image! The reasoning here seems a bit circular... (One thing...

Yeah. And if it is a real enemy development, would you still trust their “transparency”? That’s all i’m saying, their science is classified, so they’re not really “doing science” in a classic, open, academical way.

I agree with you, we are forced to trust their analysis which is hidden from us. They are probably getting some stuff wrong (just because mistakes always happen), and it's frustrating not to be able to independently analyze their data and confirm...

Yeah. And if it is a real enemy development, would you still trust their “transparency”? That’s all i’m saying, their science is classified, so they’re not really “doing science” in a classic, open, academical way.

It might worth clarifying AARO's actual congressionally mandated duties, as I think they are often misunderstood to include release of analysis and data of UAP cases as a primary duty. Their actual primary mission is to collect and analyze data...

I don't think you do, but many here are so used to "anomalies" being equated with aliens, we sometimes have a knee-jerk reaction. IF there is a video or account that seems to "defy conventional physics" it often can be slotted into a number of...

I think it's very much case-by-case. We know a lot of old data was simply not preserved. We see some cases, like Aguadilla, where they seem to just use the on-screen data. But I think that at the very least they will have on-screen data for most...

Do you assume “anomalies” MUST be aliens? I don’t.

I didn't mean AARO there, USG, or DoD, or wait, wasn't it ODNI that UAPTF was placed under? Well, whoever is in charge. Nevertheless, as established by law and in accordance with direction from the Secretary of War, AARO places a heavy emphasis...