I would imagine that varies case by case. Again, classification, redaction and de-classifying are NOT controlled by AARO. Corbell has leaked a few of these videos without redaction, so it's safe to assume some exist in that form. As for...
Do we know if AARO really only has those redacted videos we see, or have access to telemetry or more unredacted data?
I made no assumption that something "mysterious" like the Flying Spaghetti Monster exists.
With respect, equating UAP to...
Remember, the redacting has nothing to do with AARO. They have all the access they need, supposedly, but after that, it is up to the various agencies where these videos likely originate to handle the declassification, if any. If the Air Force...
AARO hasn't claimed that any of the May 2026 releases, or anything else, show anomalous things in the sense of something likely to be of extraterrestrial origin or new to science in some profound way. AARO receives reports of things that the...
When investigating the Chilean case, there were many scientists and government officials who didn't understand what they were looking at. Kosloski saying that there are cases he and his colleagues "do not understand" doesn't mean they are...
Likewise, was able to replicate, but wonder if this related to persistence of vision? If I turned the brightness of my screen down there is a point where the effect goes away. For my vision, this is a few clicks above fully dark (and I've got low...
Here, they talk about signatures.
But you are actually right, for the majority of unidentified cases they talk about lack of data.
Anyway, however we are gonna put it, the data we have is redacted, no telemetry, no screen info, nothing.
Just...
This just isn't true. The only thing that might silence the UFO crowd is conclusive evidence that ET is here and that the U.S. government knows all about it. Anything less will inevitably be interpreted as proof that the government is hiding the...
Where do they say this? Where is a quote that they have cases with lots of data and they remain anomalous? What I've read so far, is that the unexplained cases are often due to a lack of data. Maybe I'm missing something?
But would they have said that same thing about Gofast, Flir1/Tick-tack and Gimbal? The ability of a member of Congress to identify the odd bit of LIZ footage is not likely to be better than that of the general public, and their tendency to see...
Look, as said earlier, I do not claim that there is or isn’t anything anomalous. AARO does.
The only way we could actually know if they’re wrong, misguided or simply incompetent is to verify the data they do not give us.
But again, this is based on the assumption that there is anything truly anomalous for the scientific community to investigate. Otherwise, we're simply asking to see classified footage captured using classified military systems because a number of...
Agreed, and the full data may simply not be definitive.
Consider that military systems are not designed to generate scientific data sets. They are designed to detect potential threats and possible targets with various requirements for system...
I guess I don't see where this statement equal these statements:
I don't see AARO saying they have 2-5% of cases with "multi-sensor" evidence that are truly anomalous. They are saying there are a few cases that can't be explained, but are...
"You are technically correct... the best kind of correct."
But I didn't mention hyperealism. And I wouldn't count the Amoco alien, kept mostly in shadow and lacking crisp details, as an example.
I'll stand by "you can't say this is arelistic...