Latest activity

Are you seriously suggesting that experience gained from hundreds and hundreds of previous investigations is "an emotional stance"?

I was thinking along the lines of artists like Ron Mueck (his work starts in the 1990s) who creates incredible hyperrealistic sculptures often at massive scale. Seen in person they are very powerful. Or there's Duane Hanson whose work preceeds...

Perhaps because the cases that do not have that sort of issue get resolved several steps before the "getting leaked or released as anomalous" step.

When AARO uses the term "anomalous", it often doesn't mean "exciting" or "inexplicable", it means "not identified". At no time has AARO claimed it has evidence of extraterrestrial life or extraterrestrial artefacts of any sort. At no time has...

Yeah the simulation will not be 100% atmospherics can vary, your lens might distort slightly differently, there's a few factors that make some satellites show not quite as they did in reality.

What good does it do to guess (and hope?) that videos and documents we don't even know exist would potentially show something anomalous? We have the declassified material to study, and skeptics have already done a great job analyzing most of...

BUT... they were initially claimed to show incredible speed skimming low over the ocean, amazing acceleration and strange and mysterious rotation while in flight, respectively, by UFOdom. It took some amount of work to demonstrate that this...

I don't think you do, but many here are so used to "anomalies" being equated with aliens, we sometimes have a knee-jerk reaction. IF there is a video or account that seems to "defy conventional physics" it often can be slotted into a number of...

I think it's very much case-by-case. We know a lot of old data was simply not preserved. We see some cases, like Aguadilla, where they seem to just use the on-screen data. But I think that at the very least they will have on-screen data for most...

I guess that's what the ufologists would say but this isn't correct. Hyperrealism has nothing to do with the existence of the object. It's a technique to create a sense of uncanniness by creating realistic forms: skins, hairs, eyes, teeth, claws...

I was thinking along the lines of artists like Ron Mueck (his work starts in the 1990s) who creates incredible hyperrealistic sculptures often at massive scale. Seen in person they are very powerful. Or there's Duane Hanson whose work preceeds...

They also seem to have discarded this radar data at a later date, so this 'formal confirmation' can't be examined in detail. We are relying on human memories and second-hand accounts.

Also because as you said before (with good reason) we cannot debunk them all, and we cannot debunk stuff like a grainy something with no further data. Since this data is somewhere, I'd love to have that released as well. I'm really not...

Confirmed; it was just these houses in the mountain 9.5km away.

There is another odd sequence that needs a proper explanation. Most of the other bright points in the video appear clearly above the water, with no real ambiguity. This one is different: it looks smaller, less distinct, and it partially fades...