Latest activity

Well ...I'm seeing it with respect to myself. Am I rich? Probably richer than most of my neighbors (in a modest suburb), certainly rich compared to genuinely poor people, not at all rich when compared to the standard most people think of as...

I think the other more fundamental problem with that scenario is basic ownership. IF Mellon did in fact know about some form of advanced technology, how would he have any ability to bring it to market? Presumably, whatever this supposed...

Angeles National Forest this morning.

BUT... they were initially claimed to show incredible speed skimming low over the ocean, amazing acceleration and strange and mysterious rotation while in flight, respectively, by UFOdom. It took some amount of work to demonstrate that this...

Where did AARO claim this? The report you cited with a similar claim is NOT from AARO. It was from the UAP Task Force and was compiled before AARO existed. This, and the problems with the UAPTF were explained up-thread. Because AARO, and it's...

You "assume". The supposition that the "something" the reports are based on is something other than the boringly mundane (or for that matter, not an outright attempt at a hoax) is also unwarranted. "We need" ...no we don't. You certainly don't...

But your (premature) assumption is that "believe in the possibility" is somehow the default position. I disagree, categorically. The tales of "something mysterious", however that's defined, are surely the extraordinary claims for which...

Where do they say this? Where is a quote that they have cases with lots of data and they remain anomalous? What I've read so far, is that the unexplained cases are often due to a lack of data. Maybe I'm missing something?

I guess I don't see where this statement equal these statements: I don't see AARO saying they have 2-5% of cases with "multi-sensor" evidence that are truly anomalous. They are saying there are a few cases that can't be explained, but are...

Snort!

I think you're missing the basic reason for a SCIF. Nobody outside the SCIF knows what's being said. Any claim, even such a non-specific claim as "crazy stuff", is nothing but hearsay and speculation.

Nor mine, which to be fair is largely to same time frame! I think many folks who are younger or newer to an interest in UFO stuff maybe don't have a real sense of the history of UFO stuff. If someone knows about the surge of interest in the...

Are you seriously suggesting that experience gained from hundreds and hundreds of previous investigations is "an emotional stance"?

I think it's very much case-by-case. We know a lot of old data was simply not preserved. We see some cases, like Aguadilla, where they seem to just use the on-screen data. But I think that at the very least they will have on-screen data for most...

Nor do I. But you have not drawn a distinction between the two. Do you assume (wrongly) that anomalies must be things of interest? A thing in the LIZ is anomalous, i.e. we don't know what it is. A thing described verbally by a witness may be...