It (visually) traverses hald the most zoomed-in screen in 6 frames, so 12 frames for, let's call it an "1a" screen . leaving at 8562
30 frames later, without the view moving much, the view widens to 2a
70 frames after that it zooms out another...
That crossed my mind as well, for example in the recent Syria thread where the question was whether the video had been filmed off a screen. Doesn't that imply that the person doing the filming is in the office of the person who has the video...
That is my understanding. Why they would not make a list that focused on the claimed Real Clear Close Convincing Videos of Clearly Seen Technological Objects, and instead create a list of Yet Another Balloons, Too Far Aways and Featureless...
It seems that the official release has a few more seconds to it, with another change of mode and extended view.
Would be interesting to check if the object should be in the frame then (and if it can be found).
You can actually track the shadow of the object from the 3:47 mark, it appears from bottom right of the large redaction box on the left side of the screen. The artifacts are horrible so it's quite difficult to follow.
My guess is that the...
It's great that you're methodically examining the visual evidence, but 21 degrees seems a bit of a shallow angle.
We seem to be seeing the sub from the top as much as from the side (if that makes any sense), perhaps implying a steeper angle.
As...
Overall timeline for reference
This isn't directly related to the question of the grid-burn vs blotchy-burn photos, although there are additional clues herein. Just adding for completeness.
Sources:
Davis (RCMP), 26 May 1967 report (cited as...
Rick, we've had similar conversations in other threads. Maybe it's a cultural thing. FOX News is one of many media sites we can choose from in the US. It leans right. One can also watch MSNBC which leans left and all kinds of other outlets. All...
deirdre said:
This thread is unseemly.
Hmmm...while seeing one of my "Grandmother's words" always gives me a little smile,
I'm not sure we should repackage a (former) member's words, applying them to circumstances they haven't even seen...
No, I think that was the 46 or so videos that Luna demanded. This is in response to Trump's order (not sure if it was an official order or just a tweet or something). There might be some overlap.
Yeah, without that they are pretty much worthless no matter if they look like blurry dots or perfectly crisp. The three Pentagon videos would be worthless too without witnesses backing them up.
No, I think that was the 46 or so videos that Luna demanded. This is in response to Trump's order (not sure if it was an official order or just a tweet or something). There might be some overlap.
Hello, everyone. I just came across a reference to this forum in the March/April issue of Skeptical Inquirer. It looks like an interesting place to lurk, read, and contribute to whenever it makes sense. I'll probably be in a "getting to know you"...
Greetings and salutations from a long-time lurker. Some conspiratorial debunk in the nether regions of this forum's archives penetrated my consciousness many years ago, but I have forgotten which incident. Not one of the bigguns, but something...