Latest activity

Greetings and salutations from a long-time lurker. Some conspiratorial debunk in the nether regions of this forum's archives penetrated my consciousness many years ago, but I have forgotten which incident. Not one of the bigguns, but something...

If that were the case, wouldn't you think a "UFO Evidence" list might contain some actual "evidence" of UFOs? So far none of them I've looked at seem to be compelling in any way, but then I'm looking at them with a skeptic's eyes, not those of a...

...but be aware that the plane can often be well ahead of the towed sign, and smaller than expected. EG: And when flying upwind, they can move EXTREMELY slowly. Well rats, what fun is that? ;) But is it possible it was a square/rectangular...

Hello, everyone. I just came across a reference to this forum in the March/April issue of Skeptical Inquirer. It looks like an interesting place to lurk, read, and contribute to whenever it makes sense. I'll probably be in a "getting to know you"...

A few moments after we first see it coming toward us/downward, it crosses a shadowed place where it can be seen clearly, and its shape and size seem to change ...as if it were flapping its wings. Toward the end of its journey we can see it...

It's great that you're methodically examining the visual evidence, but 21 degrees seems a bit of a shallow angle. We seem to be seeing the sub from the top as much as from the side (if that makes any sense), perhaps implying a steeper angle. As...

Which brings us to the question: Has anyone obtained the NAMES of the people who uploaded these files? Would seem to be relevant to the question of their origin. Just saying 'they were uploaded' is not really a satisfactory answer if Congress...

deirdre said: This thread is unseemly. Hmmm...while seeing one of my "Grandmother's words" always gives me a little smile, I'm not sure we should repackage a (former) member's words, applying them to circumstances they haven't even seen...

If you don't have a lot of good stuff to release, you release this.

Hello, everyone. I just came across a reference to this forum in the March/April issue of Skeptical Inquirer. It looks like an interesting place to lurk, read, and contribute to whenever it makes sense. I'll probably be in a "getting to know you"...

Which brings us to the question: Has anyone obtained the NAMES of the people who uploaded these files? Would seem to be relevant to the question of their origin. Just saying 'they were uploaded' is not really a satisfactory answer if Congress...

Maybe because people like Corbel are providing the lists? I'm wondering where his credibility goes with these releases. On the one hand, he can confirm that he's been getting the real deal from leakers inside. On the other, there's still not much...

Which is what would be expected if there is nothing to release, other than Low Information Zone cases where the "object;" if there is one, is too far away to resolve, plus a few glares and lens flares. Members of congress interested in this...

Ross Coulthart, :rolleyes: on 5/22/26, tried like hell (for over an hour) to make this important, despite ultimately conceding: "...frankly, they're pretty underwhelming..." [1:16:45] Source: https://www.youtube.com/live/POD4iAL4teM

I am not sure you can go from the brightness frequency to the wing flapping frequency this easily. I'd say the cross section (and so the reflectivity/brightness) oscillate twice per wing flap, but I could depend on the viewing angle/bird species