Latest activity

Another thing to consider is rotor or fixed-wing drones which have deployable parachutes. https://www.suasnews.com/2005/12/boeing-australia-and-iai-win-australian-uav-contract/

I noticed the rectangle shape too. This shape is used in parachutes that are the paraglider style. But the parachutes on flares are classic half dome. Another reason this is not a parachute. As for the counterarguments as to why my distance...

I think that's just local area adjustable gain control. These consecutive frames are a good example.

The UFO contradiction is that the better quality images are recognisable and thus never end up in the UFO pile, it's a self selecting subset.

Quick explainer video of the parallax hypothesis. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn9G1TEEqFE&lc

The UFO contradiction is that the better quality images are recognisable and thus never end up in the UFO pile, it's a self selecting subset.

Quick explainer video of the parallax hypothesis. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn9G1TEEqFE&lc

Ah I see. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not expecting high-quality immaculate videos and images, and I’m not that naive to think that military cameras have borderline magical properties, just something of a better image quality than what we were shown.

DOW-UAP-PR35 geolocated in Greece... Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1t8nyby/dow_files_i_found_where_the_uap_video_in_greece/

I think that's just local area adjustable gain control. These consecutive frames are a good example.

What if it is great equipment, but the UAP is so far away that even the best equipment cannot resolve it well enough to see what it is or get a sharp focus? These are not the best they have -- the best they have show clearly that what is being...

It is the Low Information Zone, its a part of the range of images that a sensor can capture, just well enough to determine that something is there, but not well enough to determine what it is. This is why unidentified objects are often captured...

We have long realized that no "disclosure" will satisfy the UFOlogy crowd unless it reinforces what they already think. No disclosure? Angry response: "They're hiding stuff from us!!!1! Disclosure? Angry response: "They're hiding the GOOD stuff...

Well, I can confidently say that I'm not surprised by these videos in this thread. I barely had any expectations, and I still feel disappointed. As expected, all of them are of terrible quality, showing a small mundane dot moving in unassuming...

Is there such a thing as ontological underwhelmemt?