Latest activity

Staff online

Members online

  • JMartJr
    If one was expecting photos of aliens from Zeta Reticuli and flying saucers at the Skunk Works, then yes. If in fact none of that stuff exists and the DoD is just tossing out whatever they have, then maybe it starts to make the people clamoring...
  • John J.
    John J. replied to the thread The Varginha UFO.
    The film is not an impartial, unbiased investigation. Like many other UFO-related films, It takes it as axiomatic that something extraordinary happened. Claims are taken as evidence without consideration of more likely alternatives. You will be...
  • JMartJr
    So we got a new update from Sean Kirkpatrick on this event. Just adding this for the record. 0:00 – 0:12 "And we all saw the result of what happens when you turn those filters off. When we turned those filters off after the Chinese...
  • jarlrmai
    jarlrmai reacted to koolkake's post in the thread PR38: The "Chandelier" UFO with Useful Useful.
    Looks extremely similar to an image released by CENTCOM regarding a downed US RQ-4A in the Strait of Harmuz.
  • JMartJr
    I think this is just another parallax object, a bird or a balloon. It's the drone (with the camera) that is moving and turning.,
  • Mick West
    Like this, a proof of concept, not an exact replication https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?custom=99999999/PR48 With Racetrack and towers/20260509_165333.js
  • john.phil
    john.phil replied to the thread PR38: The "Chandelier" UFO.
    Did you have a chance to watch the footage in post #73?
  • Kyle Ferriter
    Kyle Ferriter reacted to Arthur 33's post in the thread PR38: The "Chandelier" UFO with Disagree Disagree.
    To answer my first question. There is no parachute, it's clearly lens flare. Embarrassing you guys came to that conclusion. If you observe the video closely you will notice the distance between the claimed parachute and the central object...
  • john.phil
    john.phil replied to the thread The Varginha UFO.
    Varginha is a typical case in which ufologists connect dots between events that are unrelated until proven otherwise; are biased toward the extraordinary claim, and tend to believe any account they come across that might corroborate their bias...
  • A
    Arthur 33 replied to the thread PR38: The "Chandelier" UFO.
    Answering the question of is the object moving is more difficult. Now that we know the "smoke trail" is not smoke but a image artifact that makes it possible the object is static. It could be the sun, and the perceived movement is just the...
  • A
    Arthur 33 replied to the thread PR38: The "Chandelier" UFO.
    To answer my third question, it's clearly persistence of vision and not a smoke trail. The winds at that height would have blown the trail if it was smoke. But it maintains perfect stability through the video.
    • trail.JPG
  • HoaxEye
    this is the first release... https://www.war.gov/UFO/ There is a collection of numerous images, pdfs and videos. Edit- my initial review of the videos shows that they are more of the same - thermal videos from Reaper type UAS that show small...
  • Ann K
    Do we think the mushroom thing at [1:02] between the turbines is an some kind of platform? Like this: It makes you realise the scale. I think the white dot is nowhere near the turbines. Ah, I think it's like this thing. EDIT: an offshore substation
  • HoaxEye
    https://www.war.gov/UFO/ This is the first tranche of videos and documents released by the DoW (formally DoD). there are a lot of old documents, some fairly new pilot reports, and some new videos. I'll update this top post with links to files...
  • A
    Arthur 33 replied to the thread PR38: The "Chandelier" UFO.
    To answer my first question. There is no parachute, it's clearly lens flare. Embarrassing you guys came to that conclusion. If you observe the video closely you will notice the distance between the claimed parachute and the central object...
    • 11a.JPG
    • 11b.JPG
Back
Top