Latest activity
What's new
Staff online
-
flarkeySenior Member.
-
Edward Current reacted to Chief Gleeby's post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with
Wow.
This is the energy the documents are giving off so far :p -
UAV Hive replied to the thread Copenhagen airport closure due to reported drone activity.Excellent, I look forward to seeing it. You did a good job quickly putting out videos last year. -
UAV Hive reacted to ThomasH's post in the thread Copenhagen airport closure due to reported drone activity with
Like.
There will be a documentary on Danish national TV on May 12, where they use some of my videos ;) -
UAV Hive reacted to ThomasH's post in the thread Copenhagen airport closure due to reported drone activity with Like.
I emailed with Peter when they released a big story about it last year. They had the same conclusions as in all my videos, but he say he never had seen them. If that's true it's actually pretty cool they come to the same conclusion :)
-
BBolog replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.DOW-UAP-PR46 Hi, this thing look a lot like a X37-B reentry :
-
-
purpleivan replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.Regarding the image above, it is AS17-147- 22469. A higher resolution version can be found as part of the NASA's release of imagery on Flickr (amongst other places) in the Apollo Image Gallery... -
-
Mick West reacted to Harabeck's post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with
Agree.
I'd say you should start a thread if there's a case you want to analyze. -
John J. reacted to yoshy's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Agree.
This isn't meant to be pedantic, but the proper phrasing would be "fails to reject the null hypothesis". P-values aren't able to prove or disprove the null or alternative hypothesis, since p-values are the probability of observing a statistic at... -
Ann K reacted to yoshy's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Agree.
This isn't meant to be pedantic, but the proper phrasing would be "fails to reject the null hypothesis". P-values aren't able to prove or disprove the null or alternative hypothesis, since p-values are the probability of observing a statistic at... -
Ann K reacted to John J.'s post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with Like.
I've wondered along similar lines. It's interesting that a disproportionate number of these released UAP cases are IR imagery (as Gimbal was)- I say disproportionate because the military use visible spectrum cameras too, as does pretty much...
-
Yyoshy reacted to HoaxEye's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Like.
I continued the analysis with RA/DEC comparison plots. On the left, the third-party 107K list. In the middle: Vasco60 survivor candidates, and on right, the Vasco60 full tile footprint. Observations here...
-
Yyoshy replied to the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey.@HoaxEye compliments to your code quality! Thoroughly documented, type annotations, clean structure. Great work!
-
Yyoshy replied to the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey.This isn't meant to be pedantic, but the proper phrasing would be "fails to reject the null hypothesis". P-values aren't able to prove or disprove the null or alternative hypothesis, since p-values are the probability of observing a statistic at...
-
Ann K reacted to Chief Gleeby's post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with
Funny.
This is the energy the documents are giving off so far :p -
Yyoshy reacted to Mick West's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with
Winner.
I think the headline here should be that this new paper seems to prove the null hypotheses. As it says A Bruehl-style calendar-day comparison gives a descriptive post-test asymmetry (RR = 1.35, 95% CI [0.91, 2.00]), but that statistic is tied...
