For unresolved IR footage, “area of contrast” is probably the most accurate way to describe the subject matter. Referring to the area as an “object” would imply that the source corresponds to a physical phenomenon occupying three-dimensional...
This one with the off-shore windmills looks easily geolocated at least. DOW-UAP-PR48, Unresolved UAP Report, INDOPACOM, 2024
https://www.war.gov/UFO/#DOW-UAP-PR48-Unresolved-UAP-Report-INDOPACOM-2024
They tend to show up nicely on Sentinel 2...
For unresolved IR footage, “area of contrast” is probably the most accurate way to describe the subject matter. Referring to the area as an “object” would imply that the source corresponds to a physical phenomenon occupying three-dimensional...
I suggest that each thread title should include a consistent prefix referring to today's release, so that all individual case discussions are clearly grouped.
This already has its own thread, and an explainer video:
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/the-chandelier-ufo.13307/
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAG_JIqPcOQ