No, it does not. There is nothing in the code that predicts bumps or steps. We simply observe those things happening. All it predicts is the curve (which is hard math, constrained by the physical reality of the gimbals, which is maybe why the...
There are two theories, and it's a mistake to conflate them.
1) The Glare Theory - which I think is very well demonstrated, and does not rely on the distant plane theory.
2) The Distant Plane Theory - Where there's a set of possible traversals...
My claim is that the witness saw a decorated lookout tower or its reflection and misperceived it as a cone-shaped light display from a UFO. The witness is unreliable and possibly fabricating some details, definitely embellishing them over time...
What's worse, the Space Is Fake NASA Is Lying people are sharing fake AI garbage all over the place, and pointing out all the stuff that is nonsensical, and claiming this proves NASA is faking the whole thing.
One of the most annoying things about Artemis has been the huge number of AI images that you have to sift through to find the real ones. Apollo never had this problem :rolleyes:
Right, I noticed the horn situation too, and perhaps it is an echo of the Liberty. Hard to say. There also seem to be fighter jet /eagle hybrids in the pic too.
Right, I noticed the horn situation too, and perhaps it is an echo of the Liberty. Hard to say. There also seem to be fighter jet /eagle hybrids in the pic too.
Enough with the side quests.
Fact: In your own video you said "...and finally we end just before another correction would be needed."
Fact: You also explicitly referred to "bumps before rotation" as one of the observables, and they are...
16 minutes, 57 seconds
which means the pod needs to rotate more in the counterclockwise direction so we get this long correction until the jet stops banking
17:05
17 minutes, 5 seconds
then there's one more correction like the others and finally...
Under the assumption that the pod rolls when deviation gets >2°, or something like that (2-3°), it predicts when the step rolls should happen.
Unless you consider the step rolls are random and can happen with different deviations from center...
There is no predictive simulator of bumps. Why would it identify any bumps. Bumps are things that we observe happening.
But the code makes no predictions. It does not attempt to stay in a deviation range. That's just what is observed.
There's...