And Musgraves' "sick burn" (as UFOTwitter describes it) is not really a problem, as now 750K people have seen the real explanation, which is probably 20x the people who would have seen it before.
I didn't reply, as it's just silly. Also, I...
And Musgraves' "sick burn" (as UFOTwitter describes it) is not really a problem, as now 750K people have seen the real explanation, which is probably 20x the people who would have seen it before.
I didn't reply, as it's just silly. Also, I...
What a childish, rude response by Musgraves. And a weak piece of "journalism" by Casey Holaday at The Independent (@NoParty's post #15) whose takeaway message seems to be: if a celebrity makes an extraordinary claim, don't have the temerity to...
I was curious how long it would take the media to allow that, while sure, hers is a super fun story, a good, level-headed explanation exists. This morning, the Independent did...wonder how long she'll stick to her defensiveness...
To the subject ot this thread, I used Help/ADSB Replay for this time and Location. But this is particularly challenging, as we have contrails, but not planes. The contrails are only forming in particular region/altitude of the sky. So basically...
I was curious how long it would take the media to allow that, while sure, hers is a super fun story, a good, level-headed explanation exists. This morning, the Independent did...wonder how long she'll stick to her defensiveness...
https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?custom=1/Gidd%20Cross%20with%20Wind/20260412_175020.js
The time was displayed as 20:42 GMT, but it's actually BST (based on where Venus is), Then there are two planes that you can get the contrails (white) to...
When all they've got is insults you know you're winning the argument.
Source: https://x.com/UAPWixy/status/2043113336464978417?s=20
Source: https://x.com/flarkey/status/1990534353039094217?s=20
Now that I've had a chance to look at this on a proper screen and not my tiny iphone, I'm torn between it being a patch of light and possibly my dog... #263
I took a few different shots of the area at different times/days. Light patches on the...
The best attitude to this sort of case is to assume that the witnesses are all broadly correct in their descriptions. It is their interpretation which is likely to be wrong. In this case, the many witnesses report a wide range of different...
Apollo 13 passed much closer to the moon, 254 km at closest approach. Artemis 2's closest approach was 6,545 km, so they could see much more of the surface. They are the first humans to get a full look at Mare Orientale, for example.
Why should witnesses who have more data not be asked to share that data?
We can't validate data we don't have, we'd just be open to "maybe you still got the time wrong" What is tiresome is reluctance to share details that can help resolve cases...
When all they've got is insults you know you're winning the argument.
Source: https://x.com/UAPWixy/status/2043113336464978417?s=20
Source: https://x.com/flarkey/status/1990534353039094217?s=20
So she saw lights that look and behave like Starlink Flares in a part of the sky that Starlink flares would be, at a place and a time that we know Starlink flares would be visible.
What else do you think they could be? And if the lights she saw...