I think the headline here should be that this new paper seems to prove the null hypotheses. As it says
A Bruehl-style calendar-day comparison gives
a descriptive post-test asymmetry (RR = 1.35, 95%
CI [0.91, 2.00]), but that statistic is tied...
Fixed! (2.44.6)
Also, ICYMI, there's now a "Satellte Mode" under the Camera Menu that works a lot better when pointing the camera more straight up or down.
Also, fixed that annoying judder when panning rotated camera.
In fairness to the media (I feel like I need a shower for saying that, a bit) the Integrity crew did see parts of the far side that nobody has seen by eye before -- being further from the surface, they saw areas that the lower-orbiting Apollo...
Jeebus, 5pm? Someone had it livestreamed on their phone in the pub last night, and by my recollection it was past 3am. (No need to recollect, one of my IRC windows says "03:09 < FatPhil> splashdown!".) Trust me, we euros enjoyed the event more...
The stars are fine. The satellite is just a bit off.
It's because it's a manually created TLE, made from visual observations. Based on that, the angular difference is perfectly acceptable.
I recall there being a comment in the initial nuclear-association paper that the authors blindly chose the +/- 1 day date range to register their target ahead of running the numbers, presumably to avoid p-hacking -- picking data after the fact to...
The stars are fine. The satellite is just a bit off.
It's because it's a manually created TLE, made from visual observations. Based on that, the angular difference is perfectly acceptable.
I still think it's the Qianfan train though, it just puzzles me why it's so unprecise. We're used to everything matches very well.
....is it because it's made in China? ;)