There is no evidence that this "enemy" exists, much less that it is hostile.
They had better evidence with the war that's in the news, because at least Iran exists.
But that's the problem. If individual cases are wrong or have bad data, they're not evidence for a trend. Each and every individual case needs to be studied first, then if it's unexplained, it might be evidence for a trend. And a trend doesn't...
Pointed out on this forum a couple of years age (and I can't recall the author - sorry!) that if there are no UFOs (in the sense of extraterrestrial craft), then of course the witnesses are all wrong.
I do like the phrase "the sum is greater than the parts" in many aspects of life, science and technology where it absolutely applies. However, the problem with using it in the study of UFOs and in an investigate sense is that if we if we include...
Interesting video. Total nonsense, but interesting.
When looking at imagery of places like this it can be very difficult to judge sizes and distances, no roads or buildings or large trees to calibrate your judgement.
Wonder why they used the...
like birds
aircraft hitting unidentified "clutter" is just not a thing
the last incident that came even close was a ballasted weather balloon, and that never showed up as a glowing "orb" on any video or infrared
in fact, I can guarantee you that...
Those "lines" aren't even new discovery, here is 10 year old youtube video talking about them
Source: https://youtu.be/XLP5JQfBzBY?t=91
in short: they don't really look straight like that if you check google maps yourself
Ah this takes me back. I remember when I got my first proper laptop in about 2005, the first thing I did with it was install Google Earth and the first place I looked at was my house. The second place I looked at was Papoose Lake in the search...
like birds
aircraft hitting unidentified "clutter" is just not a thing
the last incident that came even close was a ballasted weather balloon, and that never showed up as a glowing "orb" on any video or infrared
in fact, I can guarantee you that...
But that's the problem. If individual cases are wrong or have bad data, they're not evidence for a trend. Each and every individual case needs to be studied first, then if it's unexplained, it might be evidence for a trend. And a trend doesn't...
Ah this takes me back. I remember when I got my first proper laptop in about 2005, the first thing I did with it was install Google Earth and the first place I looked at was my house. The second place I looked at was Papoose Lake in the search...
Those "lines" aren't even new discovery, here is 10 year old youtube video talking about them
Source: https://youtu.be/XLP5JQfBzBY?t=91
in short: they don't really look straight like that if you check google maps yourself