Latest activity

Ah this takes me back. I remember when I got my first proper laptop in about 2005, the first thing I did with it was install Google Earth and the first place I looked at was my house. The second place I looked at was Papoose Lake in the search...

But that's the problem. If individual cases are wrong or have bad data, they're not evidence for a trend. Each and every individual case needs to be studied first, then if it's unexplained, it might be evidence for a trend. And a trend doesn't...

There is no evidence that this "enemy" exists, much less that it is hostile. They had better evidence with the war that's in the news, because at least Iran exists.

But that's the problem. If individual cases are wrong or have bad data, they're not evidence for a trend. Each and every individual case needs to be studied first, then if it's unexplained, it might be evidence for a trend. And a trend doesn't...

Ah this takes me back. I remember when I got my first proper laptop in about 2005, the first thing I did with it was install Google Earth and the first place I looked at was my house. The second place I looked at was Papoose Lake in the search...

Pointed out on this forum a couple of years age (and I can't recall the author - sorry!) that if there are no UFOs (in the sense of extraterrestrial craft), then of course the witnesses are all wrong.

From your quote: What interests Lee isn't just individual cases, but patterns: what changes in the phenomena can be identified over time, and what those patterns might indicate. Maybe he's looking for patterns, but this also sounds a lot...

Indeed. We should definitely keep an open mind regarding the possibility of everyone being wrong. ;)

Pointed out on this forum a couple of years age (and I can't recall the author - sorry!) that if there are no UFOs (in the sense of extraterrestrial craft), then of course the witnesses are all wrong.

Pointed out on this forum a couple of years age (and I can't recall the author - sorry!) that if there are no UFOs (in the sense of extraterrestrial craft), then of course the witnesses are all wrong.

I do like the phrase "the sum is greater than the parts" in many aspects of life, science and technology where it absolutely applies. However, the problem with using it in the study of UFOs and in an investigate sense is that if we if we include...

Pointed out on this forum a couple of years age (and I can't recall the author - sorry!) that if there are no UFOs (in the sense of extraterrestrial craft), then of course the witnesses are all wrong.

I do like the phrase "the sum is greater than the parts" in many aspects of life, science and technology where it absolutely applies. However, the problem with using it in the study of UFOs and in an investigate sense is that if we if we include...

As I understand it, there's supposed to be a classified installation in the basement (sub-floors?) below the new wing, so there's at least a tentative connection to national security there.

There is no evidence that this "enemy" exists, much less that it is hostile. They had better evidence with the war that's in the news, because at least Iran exists.