Latest activity

Staff online

Members online

  • Starflint
    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0GqlVf4Vfc Just add a video of the release of this kind of balloon.
  • deirdre
    deirdre reacted to NorCal Dave's post in the thread Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo with Agree Agree.
    It's a bit convoluted, but I'm pretty sure the official MoD identification was made from the originals, not the copy. In fact we can probably say the MoD never saw this photo. Having seen the faxed version, they requested, and received, the...
  • deirdre
    oh yea we do know they received negatives. since they returned negatives to the Daily Record. (and they were able to make out a second plane in at least one photo..i myself think the other photos sucked pretty bad because the alleged poster Nick...
    • 1771298741686.png
    • 1771298887243.png
  • Y
    Not really. Physics will postulate missing particles or theories (like relativity) that make predictions that can be tested. Synchronicity, in the woo sense, doesn't do that. Metaphysics gets into the why more than physics. Math starts from...
  • NorCal Dave
    It's a bit convoluted, but I'm pretty sure the official MoD identification was made from the originals, not the copy. In fact we can probably say the MoD never saw this photo. Having seen the faxed version, they requested, and received, the...
  • NorCal Dave
    NorCal Dave reacted to Dave51c's post in the thread Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo with Like Like.
    But of course they have to factor in the nearby UFO or whatever it could be. So, non-standard formation required chaps, tally ho!
  • John J.
    I'm not sure I understand. Does this mean whoever reviewed the photos/ negatives saw the plane we're familiar with, but on another photo there wasn't an image resembling that image of an aircraft, just the "barely visible" aircraft? And they...
  • deirdre
    doesn't physics/math do that all the time? based on this thread, a model cant be established because synchronicity is being defined all wrong in the first place by most! :)
  • deirdre
    deirdre reacted to Mauro's post in the thread Synchronicity - What's your experience of it? with Disagree Disagree.
    My take is coincidences are physical, real, objective events, while synchronicities are psychological, virtual, subjective events.
  • Gary C
    My take is coincidences are physical, real, objective events, while synchronicities are psychological, virtual, subjective events.
  • Y
    Ahhh sorry I should've specified I was referring to "synchronicity" as used in the woo world. It's not super well defined, but it points to some sort of guiding force (not necessarily God even). Some sort of coincidence that points to...
  • Y
    My take is coincidences are physical, real, objective events, while synchronicities are psychological, virtual, subjective events.
  • Mauro
    My take is coincidences are physical, real, objective events, while synchronicities are psychological, virtual, subjective events.
  • Y
    I've been enjoying Dr. Noc since I started having him pushed at me by the FB algorithm. I've mostly seen his short-form content, there, but am starting to work through his stuff on YouTube. Hopefully it lives up to its promise. (He focuses on...
  • Y
    What's the theoretical model to distinguish "synchronicity" and coincidence? A scientific approach would need to propose that to generate hypotheses to test.
Back
Top