Latest activity
What's new
Staff online
-
flarkeySenior Member.
-
purpleivan reacted to Mendel's post in the thread Episode 57: Alex Dietrich: Clouds, Critical Thinking, and UFOs with
Like.
Any UFO experience has two aspects, the physical and the mental. There are many examples, e.g. of pilots seeing Starlink flares, or questions that were posed on this forum, where recounting the physical aspects of the observation doesn't lead to... -
jarlrmai replied to the thread Maybe a drone? Spotted in Rio Rancho New Mexico. 01/25/2026 6:58PM..The main issue with Reddit posters is the given time is often not accurate, intentionally or not. Really you need the original accurate file date which you can often get them to give you by asking them to take a screenshot of the info screen... -
MichaelJ posted the thread Maybe a drone? Spotted in Rio Rancho New Mexico. 01/25/2026 6:58PM. in Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky?.For my first attempt at Sitrec, I am trying to answer this reddit post I found from a few weeks ago. The key information is: Appearance: 1 or 2 orbs, green light than white/blue. Date & Time: 01/25/2026 6:58PM (MST) Location: Meadowlark RD, Rio... -
-
MichaelJ replied to the thread Welcome Thread - New Members Post Here.Hello all, I found this site during the New Jersey drone flap, but lately have been trying out Sitrec myself. I'm from Oregon, and decided to make an account since the drones are coming for us too it seems :rolleyes: Source...
-
John J. replied to the thread Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo.But (sorry to harp on about this) a "blurry aircraft-like dot" wouldn't justify a description of "again probably a Harrier". Not "an unidentified aeroplane", or "an unidentified swept-wing aircraft", "a fighter-type jet of undetermined type" or... -
AAndreas replied to the thread Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo.It depends on which scenario we're considering. If the photo is "genuine," meaning it's a snapshot of a strange large object being intercepted by a jet, then we do have a problem with the jet passing by so quickly. I also have a hard time...
-
But as discussed somewhere up thread, Robinson later changed his mind on that identification of XP, deciding the grain wan't nearly as fine as he originally thought. I found this somewhat confusing and, to my mind, a big red flag. Robinson's...
-
As @Andreas noted above, they may not have had the negatives at the time. But even if they did, I think this was a standard way to create B&W copies of color photos as the paper published both. The device was literally called a "copy stand" and...
-
This means you are ill equipped to relate to what Hall would have interpreted the sky as. To misidentify a celestial object as a UFO, it typically needs to be close to the horizon, not obscured by trees or by clouds. We don't know Halt's...
-
John J. reacted to GM4AJK's post in the thread Synchronicity - What's your experience of it? with Like.
I have come to the conclusion that all synchronic events involving technology "with ears"[1] do not count. ;) [1] With ears meaning anything electronic, you can interact with that is connected to the Internet.
-
Ann K reacted to Mendel's post in the thread Episode 57: Alex Dietrich: Clouds, Critical Thinking, and UFOs with Like.
Any UFO experience has two aspects, the physical and the mental. There are many examples, e.g. of pilots seeing Starlink flares, or questions that were posed on this forum, where recounting the physical aspects of the observation doesn't lead to... -
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/claim-original-calvine-ufo-photo.12571/post-276585
-
Yes indeed. Assuming the jet was traveling at around 400 knots, the photographer would have had only a very brief window to capture the shots:
-
Ann K replied to the thread Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo.You are assuming ONE plane, when we have been told that pilots were known to have trained in low level flying by following each other down a loch. If more than one plane traveled that path, there's no need to worry about the time between shots.
-
This means you are ill equipped to relate to what Hall would have interpreted the sky as. To misidentify a celestial object as a UFO, it typically needs to be close to the horizon, not obscured by trees or by clouds. We don't know Halt's...
