the ufo never comes back in its original location (so whatever was stuck blew off or fell off?), the sparkly/flashy bits later in film are in a different location.
We get it, Perene. You're a conspiracy theorist. But what you call conspiracies are just as well explained by human mistakes, human misunderstandings, human suspicions (either grounded or ungrounded in fact), human fantasies, and the very human...
Thinking about it, it's hard to see how David Clarke can insist on being credited considering the circumstances. It might be relevant that he (or Lindsay, or Sheffield Hallam University) haven't, AFAIK, claimed to have copyright of the photo.
In...
We get it, Perene. You're a conspiracy theorist. But what you call conspiracies are just as well explained by human mistakes, human misunderstandings, human suspicions (either grounded or ungrounded in fact), human fantasies, and the very human...
the back-of-the-photo photo would be Andrew Robinson's copyright. It IS Robinson's copyright.
and unless Robinson signed over his copyright to the BACK-OF-THE-PHOTO photo, then the university does not own copyright.
Robinson cannot claim...
It's not a far-fetched idea to assume the United States have conducted multiple secret/complex military operations for decades, including acting in a country like Brazil. That's why most people don't trust them. To think this is limited to...
The video appears to be filmed from the driver's seat, because when you zoom out you can see the steering wheel and the top of the windshield.
As for the blurry spot after the UFO departs, it doesn't seem to be moving like an airplane. It could...
I don't think this is a shoe. When the object accelerates, the camera stays steady. Since the footage is zoomed in, you might assume the camera moved, but if you look closely, the pixels in the sky don't shift abruptly at the same speed as the...
Thinking about it, it's hard to see how David Clarke can insist on being credited considering the circumstances. It might be relevant that he (or Lindsay, or Sheffield Hallam University) haven't, AFAIK, claimed to have copyright of the photo.
In...
The video is pre 2017, for sure (read that with Macron's voice).
Here the 2017 repload :
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKmIROHmKmI
We can also see when one of the buildings was modified on Google Earth. I'm not sure whether this...
Thinking about it, it's hard to see how David Clarke can insist on being credited considering the circumstances. It might be relevant that he (or Lindsay, or Sheffield Hallam University) haven't, AFAIK, claimed to have copyright of the photo.
In...