Since AARO isn't telling the "believers" what they want to hear, then naturally it must be part of an alleged "conspiracy".
Source: https://x.com/PostDisclosure/status/2012646432864391344
This persistent line of questioning Mick's income...
I don't think its surprising that someone has taken the same data, followed the same methods, and ended up with the the same results. All that does is verify the process, but it doesn't validate the conclusions. What would be much more positive...
I'm fairly confident there are competent people with a background in statistical analysis and physics/ astronomy.
Without transparency for the claimed nuclear test dates used, or independent review of what photographic features Villarroel et...
I don't think its surprising that someone has taken the same data, followed the same methods, and ended up with the the same results. All that does is verify the process, but it doesn't validate the conclusions. What would be much more positive...
It's something I'm planning on getting around to investigating. But, as I've said, I'm not entirely interested in this, and have other things to do.
Maybe Zaine will be spurred to do a full 3D recreation.
Almost certainly a coincidence, and perhaps a tenuous one:
One of the interesting things about Lonnie Zamora's account is his description of a red insignia/ symbol on the object, discussed on this thread earlier.
Sketches made by Zamora
(from...
The theory that cloud motion is at an angle because of depression in the elevation angle of the camera, it is not complex, and it is not a misunderstanding.
You simply don't like it because it's inconvenient to your debunk. Or not so...