Latest activity
-
John J. replied to the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey.I'm fairly confident there are competent people with a background in statistical analysis and physics/ astronomy. Without transparency for the claimed nuclear test dates used, or independent review of what photographic features Villarroel et... -
TheCholla replied to the thread Some Refinements to the Gimbal Sim.About the date for the event, I attach a csv file that lists occurrences of wind > 110 knots at 400 hPa (near 25,000ft), between January 1 and January 25 2015, inside a 300-mile circle from Jacksonville, also excluding day time (between 7am and... -
John J. reacted to jdog's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with
Agree.
Replicating a result from poorly defined data using the same inappropriate statistical tools doesn't really move the needle. -
Ssigmops reacted to jdog's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Agree.
Replicating a result from poorly defined data using the same inappropriate statistical tools doesn't really move the needle.
-
Ssigmops reacted to GM4AJK's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with
Informative.
An interesting Xweet from Beatriz Villarroel today. -
Ssigmops reacted to GM4AJK's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with
Like.
No idea, I am merely the messenger. If I didn't post it here, someone else would have. I agree. -
Ssigmops reacted to RobertBillyBob's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Agree.
Are we supposed to be impressed by this statement? No disrespect meant to Brian Doherty, but he is just some guy in data analytics that is not even showing his work. This basically amount to a "Some guy checked it".
-
Chemtrails have gained political traction, with laws in some states. A lot of FE takes place on Youtube, and there are established debunkers like SciManDan, ConspiracyCatz, and others. We could still do FE debunks (I just proved the globe to... -
NorCal Dave replied to the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey.Can anyone find him? LinkedIn has a number of Brian Dohertys, but none of them seem to be this guy. There's no letterhead, no company name, no institution, just a Gmail account.
-
This site has a reader-generated range of topics, so what Mick himself is interested in isn't really significant. It's not as if photos supplant opinions; consider the endless number of posts about the Calvine photo, for example. Nevertheless... -
GM4AJK replied to the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey.No idea, I am merely the messenger. If I didn't post it here, someone else would have. I agree.
-
GM4AJK reacted to jdog's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Agree.
Replicating a result from poorly defined data using the same inappropriate statistical tools doesn't really move the needle.
-
Yeah but... From what I have seen, the social media facet of this is just posting videos of a sky with contrails in it, often with comments like "They are spraying a lot to day" or "the sprayers are out in force today!" There is no variety and... -
Oh I agree with that -- there just isn;t much to work with among the flood of chemtrail stuff posted on social media, is all I was saying. Proposals made to "deal with" nonexistent chemtrails might provide more material to work with, points... -
Mendel replied to the thread Mick West's Income.If you look in the posting guidelines (found under 'Info' in the site menu), you'll find that Metabunk is set up to debunk 'claims of evidence'. Witness statements can be evidence, but their value varies with the circumstances. For example, the...