Latest activity

Are we supposed to be impressed by this statement? No disrespect meant to Brian Doherty, but he is just some guy in data analytics that is not even showing his work. This basically amount to a "Some guy checked it".

Replicating a result from poorly defined data using the same inappropriate statistical tools doesn't really move the needle.

This would be this thread. As for Mick West, I was under the impression that he's only interested in analysing things with photos or videos. Everything else (witness stories, for example) can't help but be opinions. Debunkers simply want...

Replicating a result from poorly defined data using the same inappropriate statistical tools doesn't really move the needle.

This would be this thread. As for Mick West, I was under the impression that he's only interested in analysing things with photos or videos. Everything else (witness stories, for example) can't help but be opinions. Debunkers simply want...

Yeah but... From what I have seen, the social media facet of this is just posting videos of a sky with contrails in it, often with comments like "They are spraying a lot to day" or "the sprayers are out in force today!" There is no variety and...

It's almost like UFOs are the only game in town. And, paranormal stuff has become endemic in the UFO world. But one cannot debunk stories of poltergeists following UFO researchers home and whatnot, as there is nothing to analyze.

I'm not sure anything will. A canard that us not based in factwill not be refuted by demonstrating new facts. Mick destroyed the videos they based the whole UFO resurgence us based on. His debunks have survived every attempt to "rebunk" them...

For bunk that comes with some kind of photographic or video evidence, UFO's in the form of "orbs" have managed to thrive in the world of ubiquitous camera tech, sitting in most peoples pockets, as dots of lights in the sky can still be perceived...

One way to grab attention might be to state that they are a chemical called dihydrogen monoxide, that is responsible for killing thousands every year.

Replicating a result from poorly defined data using the same inappropriate statistical tools doesn't really move the needle.

This site has a reader-generated range of topics, so what Mick himself is interested in isn't really significant. It's not as if photos supplant opinions; consider the endless number of posts about the Calvine photo, for example. Nevertheless...

Replicating a result from poorly defined data using the same inappropriate statistical tools doesn't really move the needle.

An interesting Xweet from Beatriz Villarroel today.

We don't know "the odds" until we know the algorithm. ;)