In the meantime let's go back to this frame.
I'm open to the idea that I completely misinterpreted this photo. After all, I'm experienced in film photography, but lacking an education in digital photography. And I don't even own a smartphone...
Well, we know the debunk was published!
While The Oregonian is not a science journal, https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/oregonian/ says, We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.
I've added support for ground image overlays. You can drag in a KMZ with one in, or a GeoTIFF. Editing is in the works (but not yet working)
With this, there's a reasonable match as per @Trailblazer. Lining things up suggests it's on the ground...
hi, agree entirely, i stress Im no kind of expert on any of this, but recently read "The Hidden Hand: Britain, America and cold war secret intelligence" by Richard J. Aldrich, which i would recommend to anyone interested.
The final chapter...
I've added support for ground image overlays. You can drag in a KMZ with one in, or a GeoTIFF. Editing is in the works (but not yet working)
With this, there's a reasonable match as per @Trailblazer. Lining things up suggests it's on the ground...
Well, we know the debunk was published!
While The Oregonian is not a science journal, https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/oregonian/ says, We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.
I've added support for ground image overlays. You can drag in a KMZ with one in, or a GeoTIFF. Editing is in the works (but not yet working)
With this, there's a reasonable match as per @Trailblazer. Lining things up suggests it's on the ground...
Well, we know the debunk was published!
While The Oregonian is not a science journal, https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/oregonian/ says, We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.