-
Metabunk is undergoing maintenance and some site disruption may occur. I apologized for any inconvenience.
Search results for query: nist test explosive
Forum search Google search
-
WTC 7 (Building 7)
Thermite/thermate burns and melts, doesn't explode (sulfur... weakened steel... collapse) [/LIST] Not if they were on unoccupied floors. This is well documented Cutting some steel is not beyond reason. Bearing in mind 7 was supposed to be brought down from the chain reaction from ONE beam... -
The plausibility of demolishing WTC7 with explosives on 9/11
Seems pretty self explanatory to me and extremely well and patiently put. I see there was a detailed scientific debunking by comparing some dogs and breeders but apart from that savaging, there seems to be nothing much to challenge this theory offered by debunkers. -
Does NIST not testing for explosives and not testing WTC7 steel invalidate everything
We have discussed the reason they didn't test, many times. If you have someone that was shot in the head in a robbery, the ME doesn't run extensive toxicology tests. The cause of death is KNOWN. Y'all nitpick the any of the reports by the NIST or other experts, and yet I have failed to see an... -
The plausibility of demolishing WTC7 with explosives on 9/11
Just for kicks, try this instead...... CTer: Hey BombDr, Iv found a way to destroy a burning building with explosives. BD: OK, How much explosive would you need? CTer: I don't know About 2 - 4 lbs of incendiaries every 6th or 8th floor per core column for pre-weakening cuts. and around some... -
Debunked: Iron Microspheres in 9/11 WTC Dust as Evidence for Thermite
And again, you must appeal to a bare assertion rather than a demonstrated fact to try to obscure the results of Dr. Millette's work. They can find a hydrocarbon matrix, iron oxide and aluminosilicate plates in the red chips, as the Harrit team did as well, but Millette's group failed to find any...- Jay Howard
- Post #442
- Forum: 9/11
-
The plausibility of demolishing WTC7 with explosives on 9/11
"Big Bang Theory" style dialogue aside... 1. What kind of incendiary do you wish to use? 2. Are you placing it directly on the steel, or would you need to burn through the facade, plaster and fire protection first? 3. How many columns are you wanting to burn through and how much per column? 4... -
The plausibility of demolishing WTC7 with explosives on 9/11
But doesn't your video weaken your argument? The thermite is ineffective if peripherally strapped to the columns, but more effective if inserted into the columns [and I am really struggling to understand how this could have been done covertly in a busy building]; and as for knocking off the...- Brainiachick
- Post #19
- Forum: 9/11
-
WTC 7 (Building 7)
Thermite was tested as was discussed elsewhere on metabunk. Didn't find any. Also, you would need an awful lot of it. 100lbs per girder. And it is not fireproof. http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtc7.cfm 14. Is it possible that thermite or thermate contributed to the collapse of... -
Chomsky dispels 9/11 conspiracies with sheer logic [video]
I can see what you're imagining but there are a few problems with it given the evidence that was found as well as that which was not found. For instance... as I recall, they couldn't find the black boxes but they could find a relatively well preserved passport. They couldn't test the debris... -
9/11: Is this photo consistent with a progressive collapse?
See: 8. Why didn’t NIST consider a “controlled demolition” hypothesis with matching computer modeling and explanation like it did for the “pancake theory” hypothesis? NIST conducted an extremely thorough three-year investigation that included consideration of a number of hypotheses for the...