Search results

Still basically no data here..... this looks so grainy it's probably at the max range of the sensor being used. It could even be an astronomical object moving below the horizon from all we can tell. The context would be key. If they had radar lock and even a submarine checked it out....that...

That's amazing. Obviously for such performance you need to have a super light vehicle and you therefore get only minutes of flight time

Why not? Any of the other examples would be highly visible on radar unless those were also stealth drones able to spoof the Navy's radars. Big metal engines. Rotors. Etc. We know that those reports talk about "tansmedium" vehicles. So the idea that they would hide in the water/be submarine...

Wow... some of the statements are really strange. They still double down on the "unknown objects". The video might not depict what the ships actually observed and reported. A confused sailor might have filmed an airliner while an incident with unknown phenomena/drones was ongoing and it got...

I think the most probable issue here is that the DoD is not investigating those reports properly due to the "UFO" taboo/stigma. By most accounts the UAPTF is an underfunded and ill equipped organization and they often do not have all the data available...

A long interesting read about drones being the source of many of those reports: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/40054/adversary-drones-are-spying-on-the-u-s-and-the-pentagon-acts-like-theyre-ufos

I'm talking about the Navy video's clouds. I can distinguish trees and clouds :-D I'm assuming at least someone in the Navy has used some NVG before... But even so I would excuse a SNOOPY team member (as someone said in another thread... often not an expert in photography but someone normally...

Well they are distinguishable and you can see their shape at least. I think the closes Jesse gets is at 2:07 in the video. Mountains are distinguishable but not defined. Triangle slightly visible. A lot of noise. I think that setting is the right one. I'm guessing a closer and brighter plane...

Very interesting. One thing I noticed: this only works if the subject is out of focus clearly. But how much? It seems the focus needs to be "way off" for the effect to appear. We are assuming the camera was focused on the "pole" you see in the video right? Is the focus of those devices...

Well this is certainly more probable than tape triangles in front of the lens. I think the case is pretty much closed here. If the source of the lights was just regular planes and the UAPTF didn't figure it out that would be troubling....

Only other info we have: https://www.extraordinarybeliefs.com/news4/navy-filmed-pyramid-ufos Not much we can analyse here honestly.

To me the horizon looks curved (although clouds are present). I found something that could be interesting: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19037349/

Am I the only one that doesn't see the bokeh in the first lights visible in the video? Shouldn't they be triangular also?

I think this is an interesting "coincidence" and one that might explain some of the lights observed/videos. However: if this was the only phenomena observed, and given the equipment available, the utter incompetence required for the Navy to consider this unknown and even to start an...

The Pentagon has confirmed this was filmed by Navy personnel: https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/pentagon-confirms-recent-uap-ufo-leaks-as-genuine/

Interesting thanks. In this case entering EMCON would mean the intel guys were trying to collect signals from the drones or were afraid the drones would snoop their own signals right? Or do you think there could be another reason in such a scenario.

This is a good analysis pointing towards military drones (probably form China): https://sofrep.com/amp/news/navy-knows-more-about-2019-mystery-drones-incident-than-it-says/

Yes me too. The problem is the speed assumptions you are making are based on the flight envelope of the F-18. The F-18 doesn't care what the ground is doing. It only takes into account how much air is under its wings and entering its engine. Hence the difference between TAS and IAS. The...

The start of the video clearly shows someone pointing a camera down some night vision goggles/scope. So I think we can exclude that.