Minor point, but there are no clouds in the video. The camera is looking down at the ground. The light area at the bottom is a ridge, but the upper area is ground beyond it
Here's the official release combined with the earlier leak's OSD, this actually give slightly more motion info, as you can see more of the background behind the redaction boxes - although the leaked version has some duplicated frames
This video demonstrates an objection to the camera-motion hypothesis posited by Marik von Rennenkampff, on X.
He notes that the camera-relative trajectory of the object changes and suggests that this implies it is independent of the camera...
Seems like this one is a great illustration of the whole phenomenon, but slower. There is an attempt to track the object resulting in the object and the camera being synced up in relation to the background. When the tracking stops, the background...
Some others for reference:
PR034 - less clear cut, but still blinking, then change direction
PR038 - (Chandelier) single blink before loss. [EDIT: 38, not 36]
I don't think it's a hard timeout. I think if the track quality is worse, it will end...
PR078, a pattern is emerging....
Loss of lock, blinking, then zip-off as the camera changes direction. I think this is pretty definitive at this point.
The blinking mentioned also happens here. From PR59
So it's blinking because it's losing confidence in the lock, and then it just transitions to the other mode and we get a zip-off.
Looking over them again, I think the 25% one is the best one to use. It's longer than the 5% and it has the smallest redaction boxes, and is slightly better quality than the 50% one
Okay, here's the unique frames from the 5% segment (I added a "unique frames only" option to Sitrec specifically for cases like this - well, specifically for THIS case, but I imagine there will be other usages).
Then there's longer segments...
Speaking of missing frames, there's a segment of the video at 1:22, titled "5% Speed". It actually seems more like 10% speed, but it also seems to have all the frames (obviously duplicated). I think THIS is the real best footage of the zip-off...
That's how the "leaks" are giving to him. Presumably, the person providing the leak is concerned that if they actually downloaded the file from a government server, that might be traceable. And possibly illegal? So, they make a recording of...