I've said what I have to say on ICA. I don't care whether or not it is a hoax or in what way it is or is not a hoax.
Could you reword this comment a little bit better?
I've said what I have to say on ICA. I don't care whether or not it is a hoax or in what way it is or is not a hoax.
Agree with WeedWhacker, most likely for mosquito control. See the Air Force Reserve's 910th Airlift Wing.Halva they are spraying something where I live, but pertaining to cloud seeding.....preventing rain that is. I have some pictures to upload. I tried but something didn't go right but I did see a C130 plane spraying a mist over the downtown area for whatever reason I don't know.
It is just you.Is it just me or does this make absolutely no sense whatsoever???
"For months some chemtrails activists have been announcing their gut feeling that we (they?) are on the verge of a “breakthrough” and that the other side (whether official agencies such as NASA or well-known geoengineering advocates such as David Keith) were shortly going to “admit the truth".
Yes, "imminent disclosure" is frequently a feature of CTs.Except that it hasn't been just "months". It has been a constant feature of the chemtrail hoax(and lots of others, like the 'Planet X' one) for YEARS.
Yes, "imminent disclosure" is frequently a feature of CTs.
Agree with WeedWhacker, most likely for mosquito control. See the Air Force Reserve's 910th Airlift Wing.
There wasn't a cloud in the sky, temp 65ish, humidity about 50%. I go into a house for 10 -15 minutes and come out and Wow.
Those look like clouds not contrails expanding.I've been keeping a log on the weather and have seen other contrails that persisted and grew some but this was exceptional.
In the 1st picture you can see a contrail above the sun.
Except that it hasn't been just "months". It has been a constant feature of the chemtrail hoax(and lots of others, like the 'Planet X' one) for YEARS.
Hama if they were doing aerial spraying of mosquitos wouldn't that be considered chemtrails? The people below don't have a choice as to whether or not they get sprayed. At least when the city is spraying with one of their trucks, you have time to run into the house. If this video is right, these are poisons being sprayed.
Agent Orange?
Those look like clouds not contrails expanding.
They are poisons - insect poisons. Not completely non-toxic to people, but synthetic pyrethroids are used for many applications (such as pet flea & tick control, household pest control) where human contact is likely, because of their comparatively low toxicity to mammals. I'd be interested to see any evidence that they cause the long list of diseases given in that video, particularly at the rate applied for knock-down of mosquito adult populations.
In any case, whether one thinks that aerial mosquito spraying is a bad idea or not, there is no disagreement that it exists. But it does not cause those persistent trails in the sky that the "chemtrails" idea is all about.
Hama if they were doing aerial spraying of mosquitos wouldn't that be considered chemtrails?
If you're going to open the chemtrail definition up that wide... water is a chemical, as are CO2 and oxygen. In that logic, everything, including birds, people, and plants are laying down chemtrails 24/7. The definition is already uselessly vague and broad, but you're opening it up to the point that rocks and dirt are leaving chemtrails.
If you're going to open the chemtrail definition up that wide... water is a chemical, as are CO2 and oxygen. In that logic, everything, including birds, people, and plants are laying down chemtrails 24/7. The definition is already uselessly vague and broad, but you're opening it up to the point that rocks and dirt are leaving chemtrails.
Not interested in chemtrails.
I'm not into the chemtrail thing.
Hama if they were doing aerial spraying of mosquitos wouldn't that be considered chemtrails?
I'm not into the chemtrail thing.
The doesn't look at all like a contrail...just a long, thin cloud. Note the shape more closely.
Perhaps it's more illuminating when you watch cloud formation in time-lapse. We humans exist in a second-by-second time frame, but using compressed-time photography allows us to see what is really happening, and it makes better sense this way:
Here are some with contrails included...you can see how the contrails sometimes evolve into regular cirrus clouds, sometimes they disappear (sublimate). Notice, though, that they ALL (clouds, and contrails) remain up there, at altitude...and how they continue to move away from the camera's point-of-view. Because, most often the case at high altitude, there are very strong winds. This is why the "chem"trail myth is so unscientific and inaccurate:
? In another thread (yours about the C-130) you posted a YouTube video that the maker claimed showed "chem"trails. You inferred that it was "convincing" to you.
Then why did you ask me this?:
It wasn't about the chemtrails, it was about planes flying about that the air traffic controllers not knowing about. I guess thats a secret.
It wasn't about the chemtrails, it was about planes flying about that the air traffic controllers not knowing about. I guess thats a secret.
OK, thanks for letting me know.
Because you brought up about water being a chemical.
Because you brought up about water being a chemical.
It wasn't about the chemtrails, it was about planes flying about that the air traffic controllers not knowing about. I guess thats a secret.
Just want to clear a few things up....to prevent confusion.
The video that is mentioned a few posts above was NOT in "uncontrolled airspace", since it was at very high altitude.
A "non-radar environment" is NOT the same as "uncontrolled airspace".
Seems pedant, perhaps. But, needed to be said.
To clarify, 18,000 feet to 60,000 feet in the US is always controlled airspace (Class A). Generally not an issue for the private pilot though.