Yes, it can. Just an example: neutrinos had never been shown to exist when Yukawa (iirc?) proposed them as an explanation for the missing momentum in beta decay.
Of course Ann, but the laws of physics are not self-evident axioms: they are a...
To me it looks like a windblown bit of thread, perhaps spider silk or some vegetation, it likely shows up as it enters the light and vanishes as it leaves it.
Possibly disturbed by the door, likely pretty small but close to the camera lens.
The point of this thread is to provide examples that even rare things are eventually documented well.
Impossible things, however often they're reported, are never documented well.
This distinction is important.
I verified with the Ministry of Defence that the Royal Air Force (RAF) are supporting authorities under Military Aid to the Civil Authorities, with the Department for Transport being the lead agency, albeit really it's the RAF that'll be using...
I had thought one report I read might give a clue, but there's not really any directional clue other than "these are all areas close to the airport".
Police Appeal for Witnesses
Police are asking to hear from anyone who was in St Peter, La...
Folks in the other Jersey were not immunized against the perceptual error, in spite of living adjacent to the same airports for however long they'd lived there. I think it's just this:
...or, to put it more colloquially, once somebody sees a...
It would be interesting to know who reported the 'drones', where they were and what direction they were looking. I don't think that information has been disclosed yet though.
The flight path that passes directly over Jersey airport in a SW-NE direction shows up very clearly there.
Of course, you have to wonder why locals would not be used to seeing traffic on that exact route night after night. Perhaps it is just a...
I can assure you people are used to planes here, but drones? Couldn’t be more popular over the last few years, so the probability of a bias is there for sure.
Following Ian's update, I've just published this background article on Dronewatch EU, also referencing the ongoing discussion in this Metabunk thread...
Following Ian's update, I've just published this background article on Dronewatch EU, also referencing the ongoing discussion in this Metabunk thread...
Following Ian's update, I've just published this background article on Dronewatch EU, also referencing the ongoing discussion in this Metabunk thread...
I verified with the Ministry of Defence that the Royal Air Force (RAF) are supporting authorities under Military Aid to the Civil Authorities, with the Department for Transport being the lead agency, albeit really it's the RAF that'll be using...
Folks in the other Jersey were not immunized against the perceptual error, in spite of living adjacent to the same airports for however long they'd lived there. I think it's just this:
...or, to put it more colloquially, once somebody sees a...
It would be interesting to know who reported the 'drones', where they were and what direction they were looking. I don't think that information has been disclosed yet though.