Do you think anything will come of it? Or is it a big scam? How does all of this activity fit in with how you understand things from your personal experience?
I was just referring to what Andreas said about why people think this is "disclosure".
I agree you cannot test things about historical reports, only look for similarities and patterns in the reports.
I'm not sure that either "historicity" or eyewitness reports belong on our list of things that can be studied. If witnesses have described things in the past, then that's all we have. There is no further information to be had. And if later...
It was recently revealed that David Grusch is C.O.O. of a company called StarDustX Materials, Inc., which investigative journalist Ben Schreckinger reported on 17 September 2026 through his publication, PARADIGM. The company is associated with...
I think a main problem for the military is that the released videos often reveal how mundane objects are misidentified due to parallax, low resolution, and other factors that most people would expect military personnel to be familiar with. This...
I think a main problem for the military is that the released videos often reveal how mundane objects are misidentified due to parallax, low resolution, and other factors that most people would expect military personnel to be familiar with. This...
It was recently revealed that David Grusch is C.O.O. of a company called StarDustX Materials, Inc., which investigative journalist Ben Schreckinger reported on 17 September 2026 through his publication, PARADIGM. The company is associated with...
That's just the kind of junk I'd expect them to release; things that look strange at first glance and get flagged and stuck into a folder to review later, but it's clear they are mundane, and they release them anyway.
If they are redacting bits...
I think a main problem for the military is that the released videos often reveal how mundane objects are misidentified due to parallax, low resolution, and other factors that most people would expect military personnel to be familiar with. This...
I'm going for birds over bugs. The relative movement seems more consistent with that. Looking forward to seeing what more knowledgeable contributers may be able to extrapolate from the footage.
I never thought they'd release anything of substance, because I don't think there's any chance that they HAVE anything of substance*.
* unless they redefine "substance" completely to include the more creative of hoaxes.
I think a main problem for the military is that the released videos often reveal how mundane objects are misidentified due to parallax, low resolution, and other factors that most people would expect military personnel to be familiar with. This...
I agree. In this case, I think “disclosure” to Trump is “releasing anything UAP/EBE related that is classified, no matter what it is, even if we’ve seen it before in some other fashion.” Nothing more.
Like I said previously, I seriously doubt...