I don't think the camera is being "shaken loose". Seems more likely the jolts are simply the camera rotating in a manner that's not smooth.
But in summary, basically all of Marik's overly detailed side-alleys of investigational word-salad are...
No, the jolts are very obvious, and very obviously in-camera, so either the UFO knows when the camera gets jolted and starts rotating at that exact moment, or it's a jolt shaking the camera loose as it starts to rotate and it's all camera artifacts.
I remember @Mick West made a GIF some years ago on twitter and posted it. It was very clear that the rotation of the glare matches perfectly the rotation of the smudges on the lens.
Forget smudges. Just watch the horizon - the clouds. We get the following pattern: the clouds jolt, then another jolt, then a long drawn-out counterclockwise rotation, then another jolt. Watch it multiple times, watch the clouds only near the...
Almost any serious study group on UFOs, even civilian ones, usually come to the conclusion that 95/98% are prosaically explainable, whereas the 5/2% remains unexplained due to lack of data or lack of determinant data.
Quite a difference from what...
The only thing I consider a bit controversial, or silly, or whatever, is some of the statements made by AARO directors, not just Kirkpatrick but also others like Kosloski, regarding "truly anomalous" signatures.
However, nobody within AARO has...
@Fritzkquzerk
It's not a matter of trusting AARO over UAPTF, it's just that one of the two groups came to certain conclusions without having sufficient evidence to support such conclusions, thus making it a case of bad science done on UAPs.
I...
I don't doubt that all. However, if someone was interested in creating this video the time and cost may not matter much. The cost would be tied up in the computer as they weren't spending money on AI tokens back then. As for time, if someone is...