Latest activity
-
-
"Bill Gates spearheads iniative to make chemtrails invisible--the coverup continues!", I'd guess.
-
Given that Gates himself is a target in some conspiracy theories, I wonder how the chemtrail believers will deal with this? By Bill Gates published on Wednesday, Oct 7, 2026 Source --...
-
Gary C reacted to HoaxEye's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with
Useful.
Thanks Mick. Worth adding what is and isn't in that release, because it changes what anyone can do with it. The 107,875-row file is the VASCO 2025 sample. The detection output behind Solano et al. (2022). It carries RA, Dec and observation date... -
Gary C reacted to jdog's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with
Like.
Veering slightly more off-topic, but in his new UAP-hunting memoir Out of the Shadows, Jay Stratton apparently contends that the white froth reported on the ocean surface under the Nimitz Tic-Tac was the seawater boiling from the unknown energy... -
Gary C reacted to GM4AJK's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with
Funny.
Twitter/X would like a word ;) -
Gary C reacted to jarlrmai's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Like.
Yes because aliens are can build amazing spacecraft but haunt figured out what Herchel etc discovered in the 1800's
-
Gary C reacted to JMartJr's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Funny.
Best answer I ever heard for this was along the lines of "Maybe the lights we're seeing are in a wavelength THEY can;t see, they don;t even know how eye catching they are!" I don't buy it (they've abducted and tested enough people by now to know...
-
Gary C reacted to NorCal Dave's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Like.
Going all the way back to page 5-6, that's what I found. The Safety Experiments that fit the time frame were listed as follows: And the 17 dates that plates were produced that coincided with US nuclear tests didn't include any of the SE...
-
Gary C reacted to yoshy's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with
Informative.
Thank you!!! I previously wrote about their confusion with hyperparameters and this confirms it. They claim they trained models with identical hyperparameters... But there's a whole bunch of hyperparameters that are automatically set to default... -
Gary C reacted to jarlrmai's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Informative.
https://github.com/dca-doherty/VASCO-ML/blob/main/data/nuclear_tests_1949_1957.csv This is the apparent list of Nuclear tests Type appears undefined, it's unclear if date is UTC there are 160 tests listed. It also seems yield is merged into...
-
Gary C reacted to Mauro's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Like.
Oh this is a nice surprise! I'm very happy of this release. From the readme.md file in the quoted repository: Well, I don't think we can be sure that 'neither signal was used in the training': the training itself is based on the 250...
-
Gary C reacted to GM4AJK's post in the thread Rare things that have been documented much better than UFOs with Like.
I am a keen (but shi*e) amateur photographer. I used to lug around a heavy Canon DSLR and "all the kit" in a backpack. That was until I got an iPhone 13. Now I only take out the DSLR for nighttime astrophotography. And even the iPhone 13 actually...
-
I think we should think about statements given by AARO, NASA etc. and the the claims of Jay Stratton differently. They might not have equal credibility even though AARO/ NASA staff are effectively government employees as Stratton was. To think...
-
GM4AJK replied to the thread Rare things that have been documented much better than UFOs.I am a keen (but shi*e) amateur photographer. I used to lug around a heavy Canon DSLR and "all the kit" in a backpack. That was until I got an iPhone 13. Now I only take out the DSLR for nighttime astrophotography. And even the iPhone 13 actually...
