Grusch never backs up his extraordinary claims with any evidence. The AARO gave him every chance to present his evidence but (as always) he refused.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvVQePdRwjk
He's yet another example of "the more you learn about a ufo disclosure person the worse it gets". As predictable as Chinese lantern vids being misidentified as intelligent alien orbs, or one of my all-time favourites: a wind-blown chunk of party...
I was going to say that he appears less and less able to distinguish between fact and fiction every time he resurfaces, but then I realised I always considered his recounting of seeing evidence to be precisely as believable as a representation of...
1) Known underwater UFO bases multiple city blocks wide
2) Direct footage of he's seen of dead non-human entities
3) Reptilians in Tic Tacs fighting grays
4) George W. Bush sponsored disclosure simulations
5) Sentient Plasma & the Nuclear-UFO...
What exactly is weird here?
It's obviously a firework. We get the flash, we get the bang, we even get the "fshhhhhhhh" of the sparkles.
We know it's quite close from the time between the flash and the bang. I'm not gonna bother getting more...
He is researching our imagination
and since he is researching human imagination, whatever he is researching cannot be "incommensurate with our own [thinking]".
If I stated what I think of this, I'd break Metabunk's politeness policy.
Suffice it...
Possibly another example of just pushing their photography business / social media via a bit of viral UFO marketing. We've seen it multiple times "photographer records something strange"