Reply is here maybe?:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15171
We respond to the critique by Watters et al. (2026) of the statistical analyses in Villarroel et al. (2025) and Bruehl & Villarroel (2025). We argue that the critique conflates...
New preprint: Microscopy assessment of two multiple-transient candidates, Jun Yang & Beatriz Villarroel. Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26371 (submitted 26 Aug 2026). PDF version is attached.
Short summary: the paper physically re-examines two...
"Paper-parity" run has completed. Report and data: https://github.com/jannefi/poss1-plate-slice/blob/main/results/s0-642-paper-parity-20260828/README.md
This release does not replace or change anything I released previously. It's a separate...
I realise the prepublication release of the Watters et. al. critique of the 2025 VASCO research papers has already been cited on Metabunk. This article provides an update and brings it all together.
A study claimed UFOs orbited Earth in the...
I think the exact location is 33.80139002637953, -112.76146305453676 - the wooden extension is to support the observatory roof when it is open. Note that the observatory has moved from this location recently.
I'm not sure much can be done with this, as it's nearly 20 years old. Even if one wanted to try and replicate it, how? These old cameras can be found for $50-$150 here in the US. While this particular model was introduced in 2005, the underlying...
Mentioning the Higgs Boson feels like a false analogy fallacy (or perhaps there's a more accurate fallacy). It just feels like they are using the Higgs to lend credibility to their completely unrelated analysis. The response was 7 pages compared...
I did yet another analysis, this time about the differences of two full plate scans: IRSA (the ones I'm using) and STScI (the ones suggested by Villarroel). See...
Mentioning the Higgs Boson feels like a false analogy fallacy (or perhaps there's a more accurate fallacy). It just feels like they are using the Higgs to lend credibility to their completely unrelated analysis. The response was 7 pages compared...
This appears to be their critique of Watters relevant to the nuke paper in the OP:
The next issue concerns the temporal correlations with nuclear weapon tests and UAP in Bruehl & Villarroel (2025). The critique by Watters et al. (2026) (Section...