Latest activity

Members online

  • MonkeeSage
    So after reading your post I watched the video again. The zoomed in UFO just looks like a drawing, on paper. Also the moon clearly has some “light diffusion” effect around it, the UFO doesn’t. Those “lights” on the pyramid just don’t look right.
  • MonkeeSage
    The actual UFO looks awfully static. It seems like a cut-out picture of a UFO just taped to a black background. The first 30 seconds or so are the establishing shots, showing that the bright light is the moon and the people are out in a yard or...
  • MonkeeSage
    It's just too hard to see what motion comes from camera motion parallax, operator slewing, or actual object maneuvering. There's a background pattern, but we can't really tell what is fixed sensor noise, and what is possibly the ground. The...
  • MonkeeSage
    MonkeeSage reacted to fat_earther_'s post in the thread Nimitz Timeline Revisited with Like Like.
    Hello, Source: https://youtu.be/BG4yxQm51JM?si=n-qxFpRPeejka4LG I recently made a simple animation (top down, over head map) trying to get a better visualization of the Nimitz incident. I was wondering if Sitrec or some other model could be...
  • MonkeeSage
    MonkeeSage reacted to John J.'s post in the thread Department of War - UAP Release 4 with Like Like.
    That's an interesting one. @flarkey posted a picture showing diffraction spikes on the port wingtip of a plane which I guess is caused by reflected sunlight (not localised heating by sunlight, or some other heat source at the wingtip): From...
  • MonkeeSage
    MonkeeSage reacted to JMartJr's post in the thread Department of War - UAP Release 4 with Like Like.
    Astronmical objects have a rich history as UFO report triggers. Not so much the Sun, but in thec era of IR images and an office set up asking for odd looking imagery, it would not surprise me. Remember; we generally know nothing about what the...
  • MonkeeSage
    Sure, plain version: the "six-pointed star" isn't the shape of anything flying. It's made inside the camera itself. When a camera looks at a really intense point of light (or heat, for an IR sensor), the light bends slightly around anything...
  • MonkeeSage
    MonkeeSage reacted to jarlrmai's post in the thread Department of War - UAP Release 4 with Like Like.
    Useful work, some members also did some simulation in the chandelier case https://www.metabunk.org/threads/pr038-the-chandelier-ufo.13307/post-309157
  • MonkeeSage
    Following up on the PR104 mention earlier in this thread - agreed with the diffraction spike call, and since AARO's own label on it is "Unresolved" figured it was worth actually running the numbers instead of just eyeballing it.Pulled the actual...
  • jarlrmai
    It seems to me it's in the rear cab of a long cab van or truck, but knowing the vehicle type from the witness would help.
  • MonkeeSage
    There seem to be a fourth light in the UFO, on its left side, but it's elongated and different from the others, also fainter. Could it be caused by the 4th vane? Also, could the “opening” of the triangle happen because of the object changing...
  • MonkeeSage
    It looks liek I think thats a great hypothesis that we should test. On closer inspection the 'opening up' could show a small point source of light (reflective balloon?) going out of focus creating a Bokeh effect making the vanes of the mirror...
  • MonkeeSage
    Here's my recreation of the video with blender : White OSD elements are calculated from camera/UAP positions, the reddish dot is the simulated UAP. The match is good when the white N angle indicator (simulated) show the same angle as the...
  • MonkeeSage
    It happens around the time when the objects stop moving from left to right in the frame and just before the drone start banking the other way. I think a change in the angle of reflected light is more likely.
  • John J.
    John J. reacted to NoParty's post in the thread “Pyramid UFO” video from Brazil with Informative Informative.
    fwiw, we know that two of the key pieces of info we've been given, can't both be true. A camera introduced in 2011 can not have filmed a supposed 2009 event. That said, if only the event date (2009) is untrue, and the camera actually was a Sony...
Back
Top