Latest activity

  • GM4AJK
    Indeed, after watching the Sky TV recording I have (that I can't seem to share), this is basically what happened. No one reacted to anything until the Norwegian goalkeeper spoke to the ref after he blew the half-time whistle. It's only after that...
  • NorCal Dave
    NorCal Dave reacted to Harabeck's post in the thread Charlie Kirk Shooting with Agree Agree.
    Because anyone saying the boring thing aren't going to get surfaced on search engines and social media via attention driven algorithms?
  • E
    Fair, they're not perfectly collinear, already flagged that in the numbers actually. Measured separations were 64.5/54.9/60.6°, not an even 60/60/60, so there's a real asymmetry of a few degrees between the pairs. Noted it as being right at the...
  • Fritzkquzerk
    Yeah, same underlying camera artifact, different sensor/platform. The star shape itself doesn't tell you what's making the heat, that part's the same regardless of what's actually burning down there. Not familiar with the Chandelier video...
  • Fritzkquzerk
    https://www.metabunk.org/threads/pr038-the-chandelier-ufo.13307/ There you go! Thanks again for the answers about flares!
  • NorCal Dave
    So after reading your post I watched the video again. The zoomed in UFO just looks like a drawing, on paper. Also the moon clearly has some “light diffusion” effect around it, the UFO doesn’t. Those “lights” on the pyramid just don’t look right.
  • E
    Yeah, same underlying camera artifact, different sensor/platform. The star shape itself doesn't tell you what's making the heat, that part's the same regardless of what's actually burning down there. Not familiar with the Chandelier video...
  • Fritzkquzerk
    So after reading your post I watched the video again. The zoomed in UFO just looks like a drawing, on paper. Also the moon clearly has some “light diffusion” effect around it, the UFO doesn’t. Those “lights” on the pyramid just don’t look right.
  • FatPhil
    I'm sorry, but if you think those pairs of lines are parallel, you need better glasses. If whatever tool you are using is telling you that those lines are better alinged than any alternative, then you need a better tool.
  • Fritzkquzerk
    The actual UFO looks awfully static. It seems like a cut-out picture of a UFO just taped to a black background. The first 30 seconds or so are the establishing shots, showing that the bright light is the moon and the people are out in a yard or...
  • Fritzkquzerk
    Yeah, thanks, I figured it was a camera artifact because it's basically identical to the Chandelier Video, but I got a bit totally lost in the specific technical jargon. So basically it's just the same as the previous "Chandelier star UFO" video...
  • NorCal Dave
    The actual UFO looks awfully static. It seems like a cut-out picture of a UFO just taped to a black background. The first 30 seconds or so are the establishing shots, showing that the bright light is the moon and the people are out in a yard or...
    • 1784044948473.png
    • 1784045059936.png
    • 1784045209969.png
    • 1784045444366.png
    • 1784045692867.png
  • John J.
    John J. reacted to ExclusionZon's post in the thread Department of War - UAP Release 4 with Like Like.
    Sure, plain version: the "six-pointed star" isn't the shape of anything flying. It's made inside the camera itself. When a camera looks at a really intense point of light (or heat, for an IR sensor), the light bends slightly around anything...
  • John J.
    John J. reacted to GeekFurious's post in the thread Charlie Kirk Shooting with Agree Agree.
    I don't know why we have to keep entertaining this silly conspiracy theory that this guy didn't shoot Kirk. There is no other REASONABLE conclusion. So what if the bullet didn't do what some "experts" claim it WOULD do (its own red flag, as if...
  • John J.
    John J. reacted to Harabeck's post in the thread Charlie Kirk Shooting with Agree Agree.
    Because anyone saying the boring thing aren't going to get surfaced on search engines and social media via attention driven algorithms?
Back
Top