Latest activity
What's new
-
Gary C reacted to Andreas's post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with
Like.
In a way, I agree—no harm done, right? And even if we end up with no new knowledge about UFOs, we still get better sensors, and that's good for other reasons. Fair enough. But it's not that simple. Accepting that there is something genuinely... -
Todd Feinman reacted to Fritzkquzerk's post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with Like.
I actually agree. If they don’t really have anything interesting, many people should stop making those weird claims. -
John J. reacted to Andreas's post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with Like.
Why do we have to confirm that the U.S. government doesn't have secret proof of UFOs? Should we also prove that they don't have evidence of Bigfoot or unicorns? And how on earth do you think it would be possible to prove such a thing? The only... -
jarlrmai reacted to Andreas's post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with
Agree.
Why do we have to confirm that the U.S. government doesn't have secret proof of UFOs? Should we also prove that they don't have evidence of Bigfoot or unicorns? And how on earth do you think it would be possible to prove such a thing? The only... -
Nourali reacted to Fritzkquzerk's post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with Like.
Here’s the official GEIPAN methodology criteria for D cases. Do I claim this proves anomalies? No. This just proves that science on these supposed anomalies can be done but it has historically been hindered by military secrecy anyway. While... -
Nourali reacted to Fritzkquzerk's post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with Like.
I actually agree with you, but: GEIPAN's official methodology specifically defines Category D cases as anomalous precisely because of the quantity and reliability of the data. Furthermore, GEIPAN is a civilian branch of CNES; just like AARO, if...
-
Mick West replied to the thread Feature Request A way of simulating the effect of a camera bump on night sky images of flaring Starlinks.Not yet, but I could hook something up. -
Fritzkquzerk replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.I actually agree. If they don’t really have anything interesting, many people should stop making those weird claims. -
AAndreas reacted to jarlrmai's post in the thread DoW R2 - PR071 - (Lake Huron F16 vs UAP) with Like.
There's also no guarantee that those RADAR traces were a real object, or even the same object Fravor saw or Underwood recorded.
-
Bboringrealit replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.Ok, we have different ideas of what a sceptic is, fair enough. But I should add the fatted part to the loop. Maybe I do that later.
-
AAndreas replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.Why do we have to confirm that the U.S. government doesn't have secret proof of UFOs? Should we also prove that they don't have evidence of Bigfoot or unicorns? And how on earth do you think it would be possible to prove such a thing? The only...
-
Bboringrealit replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.Maybe my english isn't good enough to express what I meant to say with "or confirm that it doesn't exist". I just meant that they need to clearly communicate that it doesn't exists and give an explanation, backed up with whatever documentation...
-
Fritzkquzerk reacted to Andreas's post in the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1 with Like.
I just think we have to agree to disagree on this point. Personally, I don't think we "need the data and the research." It's not about proving or disproving alien visitations. It's about disproving individual pieces of "evidence" put forward by...
-
Mendel replied to the thread Debunking Humor....Shoulda gone with "mad software mogul". (John McAfee being the prototype, but there are others.) Technically, that's mad computer scientist. -
AAndreas replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.I just think we have to agree to disagree on this point. Personally, I don't think we "need the data and the research." It's not about proving or disproving alien visitations. It's about disproving individual pieces of "evidence" put forward by...