Latest activity

You should be! Like a cancer on the planet. We know better.

I’m more scared of humans gotta be honest here!

I don’t look for aliens.

No matter how much better sensors get there will always be things just beyond their range. The solution is more sensor locations. If your sensor can identify out to three miles, and I build an identical sensor five and a half miles away, then...

Hopefully they won’t look for you!

I’m more scared of humans gotta be honest here!

Hopefully they won’t look for you!

That’s where dangerous adversarial tech would start to show; in the LIZ. So even skeptics should want to have a careful watch. I think Dave was just suggesting not looking for aliens in particular, as he’s a skeptic.

I don’t look for aliens.

That’s where dangerous adversarial tech would start to show; in the LIZ. So even skeptics should want to have a careful watch. I think Dave was just suggesting not looking for aliens in particular, as he’s a skeptic.

Fair! I just don’t think studying the subject with better sensors and possibly with more accessible data is a total waste of time and money.

Look, If some academic scientists will start to do that in the most scientific way possible, I’m all for it. I don’t care if they find more balloons, they could even find new ways of identifying space junk and birds.

Fair! I just don’t think studying the subject with better sensors and possibly with more accessible data is a total waste of time and money.

I guess I disagree a bit here. Yes, more data is always better and maybe there is something interesting, but the history of UFOs is largely a history of mostly explainable things. Misperception, faulty memory, bad photos, outright hoaxes and as...

You said: I understand it as "it's worth believing one might be red". A lot of things "have been said", including unicorns, fairies and leprechauns. Nothing is worth believing just because "it has been said".