Latest activity

The fact that the "UAP" axis coincides with the lens axis, as discussed previously, also seems to be a reason why the "UAP" appears to be attached to the lens. In that case, perhaps the actual size of this object is very small; a bullet hole or a...

The fact that the "UAP" axis coincides with the lens axis, as discussed previously, also seems to be a reason why the "UAP" appears to be attached to the lens. In that case, perhaps the actual size of this object is very small; a bullet hole or a...

Just another observation with this, we can see that the size of the lake in the video gets bigger between the 0m11s and 1m20s time codes of the video, and therefore we can deduce that the drone is loosing altitude. However the position of the...

Yeah, the Change in orientation is weird if it’s an artifact. If it’s attached to the drone, what could it be?

Just another observation with this, we can see that the size of the lake in the video gets bigger between the 0m11s and 1m20s time codes of the video, and therefore we can deduce that the drone is loosing altitude. However the position of the...

This might be the location, 48°17'40.0"N 37°23'03.0"E looking due south. There's not a lot of pixels but to me the start and pan down sorta looks like the fields and town. The general water shape seems good. The darker lines leading off the body...

Wow, great find. That is the exact spot. It shows that my suggestion in post #15 that we might be seeing the tail-booms of a drone is complete rubbish. The lines are just fields and hedges.

Just another observation with this, we can see that the size of the lake in the video gets bigger between the 0m11s and 1m20s time codes of the video, and therefore we can deduce that the drone is loosing altitude. However the position of the...

I thought about it, what could it be? I was thinking of maybe a source heat (since the weird “steam” / “exhaust” effect behind the object. So we got the artifact from heat (glare?) of something like a structure on the ground. The second frame I...

The military grade IR cameras are for sure capable of HD or higher resolution. Not all of them (as older types are in use too), but modern equipment has high resolution. It is just down graded when made available to the public.

Thats not true. Even in 2018, you could get 720p HD IR cameras on the mid sized MX15. https://www.militarysystems-tech.com/sites/militarysystems/files/supplier_docs/PDS-MX-15-March-2018.pdf Sensor #1b - HD Thermal Imager: Type: Resolution...

Wow, great find. That is the exact spot. It shows that my suggestion in post #15 that we might be seeing the tail-booms of a drone is complete rubbish. The lines are just fields and hedges.

This might be the location, 48°17'40.0"N 37°23'03.0"E looking due south. There's not a lot of pixels but to me the start and pan down sorta looks like the fields and town. The general water shape seems good. The darker lines leading off the body...

This might be the location, 48°17'40.0"N 37°23'03.0"E looking due south. There's not a lot of pixels but to me the start and pan down sorta looks like the fields and town. The general water shape seems good. The darker lines leading off the body...

This might be the location, 48°17'40.0"N 37°23'03.0"E looking due south. There's not a lot of pixels but to me the start and pan down sorta looks like the fields and town. The general water shape seems good. The darker lines leading off the body...