Latest activity

But atually, I already see something useful This is the camera heading indicator, showing how much it's left or right of the centerline And, it matches my simulation! I'll have to add a levels slider to Sitrec so we can see this easier.

I keep going back to this site as it's the only one that seems to make any sense. If you look at it in 3D view and have the North point at the 2 o'clock position like it is in the video It has two types of turbines seen in the same order as the...

To me if it was some broken lens artifact or some other artifact it wouldn't change as the zoom changes right? Also the beach/coast is about 125 miles away. I don't know what the capabilities of these cameras are but that may be too far to make...

But atually, I already see something useful This is the camera heading indicator, showing how much it's left or right of the centerline And, it matches my simulation! I'll have to add a levels slider to Sitrec so we can see this easier.

But atually, I already see something useful This is the camera heading indicator, showing how much it's left or right of the centerline And, it matches my simulation! I'll have to add a levels slider to Sitrec so we can see this easier.

It is badly retracted. You can see the turbine (very roughly) as it passes through that area. Interesting. Theretically, it would be possible to extract SOME information from this. But I think there's too much noise, and too much information...

It is badly retracted. You can see the turbine (very roughly) as it passes through that area. Interesting. Theretically, it would be possible to extract SOME information from this. But I think there's too much noise, and too much information...

Re-compressed after being redacted another quality loss as well.

It is badly retracted. You can see the turbine (very roughly) as it passes through that area. Interesting. Theretically, it would be possible to extract SOME information from this. But I think there's too much noise, and too much information...

Is this badly redacted info (like we saw in some of the Epstein files) or is it just compression noise? (I just moved the midtone slider all the way left).

It is badly retracted. You can see the turbine (very roughly) as it passes through that area. Interesting. Theretically, it would be possible to extract SOME information from this. But I think there's too much noise, and too much information...

So moving forward from the parachute nonsense (a good example of type 2 error, and confirmation bias of "skeptics" IMHO) . The line in the image that is perhaps a contrail seems to me to indicate that the object is in fact moving. The camera...

It is badly retracted. You can see the turbine (very roughly) as it passes through that area. Interesting. Theretically, it would be possible to extract SOME information from this. But I think there's too much noise, and too much information...

Re-compressed after being redacted another quality loss as well.

Recent photos from the Apollo missions, released through the PURSUE system, appear to show unidentified objects that are likely not physical craft, but rather optical artifacts inherent to the Hasselblad 500EL camera system. My cross-analysis of...