But atually, I already see something useful
This is the camera heading indicator, showing how much it's left or right of the centerline
And, it matches my simulation! I'll have to add a levels slider to Sitrec so we can see this easier.
But atually, I already see something useful
This is the camera heading indicator, showing how much it's left or right of the centerline
And, it matches my simulation! I'll have to add a levels slider to Sitrec so we can see this easier.
It is badly retracted. You can see the turbine (very roughly) as it passes through that area.
Interesting. Theretically, it would be possible to extract SOME information from this. But I think there's too much noise, and too much information...
It is badly retracted. You can see the turbine (very roughly) as it passes through that area.
Interesting. Theretically, it would be possible to extract SOME information from this. But I think there's too much noise, and too much information...
It is badly retracted. You can see the turbine (very roughly) as it passes through that area.
Interesting. Theretically, it would be possible to extract SOME information from this. But I think there's too much noise, and too much information...
Is this badly redacted info (like we saw in some of the Epstein files) or is it just compression noise? (I just moved the midtone slider all the way left).
It is badly retracted. You can see the turbine (very roughly) as it passes through that area.
Interesting. Theretically, it would be possible to extract SOME information from this. But I think there's too much noise, and too much information...
So moving forward from the parachute nonsense (a good example of type 2 error, and confirmation bias of "skeptics" IMHO) .
The line in the image that is perhaps a contrail seems to me to indicate that the object is in fact moving. The camera...
It is badly retracted. You can see the turbine (very roughly) as it passes through that area.
Interesting. Theretically, it would be possible to extract SOME information from this. But I think there's too much noise, and too much information...
Recent photos from the Apollo missions, released through the PURSUE system, appear to show unidentified objects that are likely not physical craft, but rather optical artifacts inherent to the Hasselblad 500EL camera system. My cross-analysis of...
Is this badly redacted info (like we saw in some of the Epstein files) or is it just compression noise? (I just moved the midtone slider all the way left).
But bear in mind that birds are well insulated! Looking at thermal imagery of birds, they sometimes appear pretty hot, sometimes pretty cold, though often with hot spots where they lack feathers (feet, eyes, beak)...