Recent photos from the Apollo missions, released through the PURSUE system, appear to show unidentified objects that are likely not physical craft, but rather optical artifacts inherent to the Hasselblad 500EL camera system. My cross-analysis of...
The location for "DOW-UAP-PR27, Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, October 2023" has been found.
Coordinates port #1: 27°07'49.82"N 52°59'41.68"E (Bostano Port, Iran)
Coordinates port #2: 27°21'04.26"N 52°37'27.06"E (near Nayband...
Keep in mind a thermal camera is super different from an optical camera, because thermal wavelengths are much larger. The best sensors are still 640x480 — that's what these Reapers have. And the germanium lenses are big and heavy and crazy...
It's apparent that the parachute appears and disappears off the edge of the screen, so it isn't just focus that changes, but position. The camera simply isn't looking at the (mundane) parachute, but at its payload instead, with no regard to...
https://www.war.gov/UFO/
This is the first tranche of videos and documents released by the DoW (formally DoD). there are a lot of old documents, some fairly new pilot reports, and some new videos.
I'll update this top post with links to files...
Actually, the windfarm slightly to the north includes a substation that could be the small building in the images,,,
Although many of the windfarms there appear to have similar small substations amongst the turbines.
That's a compression artefact from an extremely low bandwidth motion-estimation-and-DCT-based codec (such as all H.261-alikes, so all the H.26x's and MPEG).
Most blocks in most frames will be close enough to the previous frame that there's no...
I think the object's apparent motion is not caused, at least not primarily, by a parallax effect.
The object appears to maintain a relatively constant apparent speed, regardless of how fast the background is moving, including moments when the...
A parachuting flare is a proposed hypothesis that fits the visuals at first glance; however, it may be a good example of dynamic pareidolia, instead of "nonsense", or a reason for embarrassment. Other hypotheses are that the "parachute" might...
So moving forward from the parachute nonsense (a good example of type 2 error, and confirmation bias of "skeptics" IMHO) .
The line in the image that is perhaps a contrail seems to me to indicate that the object is in fact moving. The camera...
It is indeed possible that the object in the video is an inspection drone used by offshore wind farms, and from an engineering and maintenance perspective, this is currently a more reasonable explanation than a "high-speed anomalous craft."...