Latest activity

Keep in mind a thermal camera is super different from an optical camera, because thermal wavelengths are much larger. The best sensors are still 640x480 — that's what these Reapers have. And the germanium lenses are big and heavy and crazy...

The line in the video, which is likely a contrail, could also have been produced in this manner

Here is a more direct video of a parachute flare shot from a low angle, creating a lens flare Source: https://youtu.be/vwVWXLhFGKc?si=bp97iGz9Vsh_sxT9&t=5

Lending support to that hypothesis, there are other frames from the various Apollo missions showing blue artifacts, sometimes in areas of the film outside of the exposure window. Frame AS14-66-9274 from Apollo 14 is a good example, where two...

If we look at the highest resolution version of this image, we can compare the granularity of the photo at the edge of the Moon's horizon, and the sharpness of the 'triangle' itself. The Moon image looks fuzzy and granular when seen in close-up...

If we look at the highest resolution version of this image, we can compare the granularity of the photo at the edge of the Moon's horizon, and the sharpness of the 'triangle' itself. The Moon image looks fuzzy and granular when seen in close-up...

The line in the video, which is likely a contrail, could also have been produced in this manner

Here is a more direct video of a parachute flare shot from a low angle, creating a lens flare Source: https://youtu.be/vwVWXLhFGKc?si=bp97iGz9Vsh_sxT9&t=5

So moving forward from the parachute nonsense (a good example of type 2 error, and confirmation bias of "skeptics" IMHO) . The line in the image that is perhaps a contrail seems to me to indicate that the object is in fact moving. The camera...

Dayenu!.. ?

Lending support to that hypothesis, there are other frames from the various Apollo missions showing blue artifacts, sometimes in areas of the film outside of the exposure window. Frame AS14-66-9274 from Apollo 14 is a good example, where two...

I agree the longer straight line looks like a possible contrail. Though could be something else. If the background is the cold sky I'd expect a contrail to be darker, not lighter than it, in black-hot. I also was thinking about the viewing angle...

Recent photos from the Apollo missions, released through the PURSUE system, appear to show unidentified objects that are likely not physical craft, but rather optical artifacts inherent to the Hasselblad 500EL camera system. My cross-analysis of...

So moving forward from the parachute nonsense (a good example of type 2 error, and confirmation bias of "skeptics" IMHO) . The line in the image that is perhaps a contrail seems to me to indicate that the object is in fact moving. The camera...

"That's some catch, that Catch-22,' he observed. 'It's the best there is,' Doc Daneeka agreed.