I've spotted a couple of errors in the descriptions and related MISREPs (originally in the DOW release)
The correct Mission Report for PR-28 is:
DOW-UAP-D25, Mission Report, Greece, January 2024 - (MISREP) A U.S. military operator reported...
If one was expecting photos of aliens from Zeta Reticuli and flying saucers at the Skunk Works, then yes. If in fact none of that stuff exists and the DoD is just tossing out whatever they have, then maybe it starts to make the people clamoring...
The people driving this are the usual suspects of Ufology who have managed to convince some politicians to make this a priority. The politicians are driving the DOD (DOW) to do this.
I've wondered along similar lines.
It's interesting that a disproportionate number of these released UAP cases are IR imagery (as Gimbal was)- I say disproportionate because the military use visible spectrum cameras too, as does pretty much...
Well, I can confidently say that I'm not surprised by these videos in this thread. I barely had any expectations, and I still feel disappointed.
As expected, all of them are of terrible quality, showing a small mundane dot moving in unassuming...
For unresolved IR footage, “area of contrast” is probably the most accurate way to describe the subject matter. Referring to the area as an “object” would imply that the source corresponds to a physical phenomenon occupying three-dimensional...
Lending support to that hypothesis, there are other frames from the various Apollo missions showing blue artifacts, sometimes in areas of the film outside of the exposure window.
Frame AS14-66-9274 from Apollo 14 is a good example, where two...
Lending support to that hypothesis, there are other frames from the various Apollo missions showing blue artifacts, sometimes in areas of the film outside of the exposure window.
Frame AS14-66-9274 from Apollo 14 is a good example, where two...