Using the newly released video:
https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006088/dow-uap-pr38-unresolved-uap-report-middle-east-2013
At timestamp 51s in the video a shape becomes visible in the upper left corner.
Later around 1m02s and 1m18s it is more...
Well, I can confidently say that I'm not surprised by these videos in this thread. I barely had any expectations, and I still feel disappointed.
As expected, all of them are of terrible quality, showing a small mundane dot moving in unassuming...
Well, I can confidently say that I'm not surprised by these videos in this thread. I barely had any expectations, and I still feel disappointed.
As expected, all of them are of terrible quality, showing a small mundane dot moving in unassuming...
For unresolved IR footage, “area of contrast” is probably the most accurate way to describe the subject matter. Referring to the area as an “object” would imply that the source corresponds to a physical phenomenon occupying three-dimensional...
This one with the off-shore windmills looks easily geolocated at least. DOW-UAP-PR48, Unresolved UAP Report, INDOPACOM, 2024
https://www.war.gov/UFO/#DOW-UAP-PR48-Unresolved-UAP-Report-INDOPACOM-2024
They tend to show up nicely on Sentinel 2...
For unresolved IR footage, “area of contrast” is probably the most accurate way to describe the subject matter. Referring to the area as an “object” would imply that the source corresponds to a physical phenomenon occupying three-dimensional...