Latest activity

That's a prediction by Mick based on an understanding of why the bumps occur, not a prediction built into the code. So why is this a salient point? You seem to be conflating our total understanding of the system with what is actually implemented...

I have no such aerospace knowledge, but I'll point out that if something's secret, the USA has miles and miles of almost empty desert area (White Sands Missile Range alone is bigger than the state of Delaware) and I cannot imagine a developer...

@Mick West , please spend your time refining your model, not arguing in circles. It's not an "explanation". The bumps are proof that the observed fast rotations originate with the camera system and not with the external world. Once the rotation...

You're focusing on one aspect (camera-induced bumps causing the rotation) and treating it as the most probable explanation, while downplaying or ignoring the broader set of anomalies and counter-points to the glare model. Here are the facts...

@Mick West , please spend your time refining your model, not arguing in circles. It's not an "explanation". The bumps are proof that the observed fast rotations originate with the camera system and not with the external world. Once the rotation...

Ive heard this vertical U-Turn being mentioned a number of times. But I'm still not sure what is trying to be said here. Is the U-Turn theory suggesting the object turned back vertically and then started coming towards the following Jet? If...

Well, the F-117 was indeed operational at the time; it had even been used in combat. The B-2 first flew in 1989, so quite a lot of research into stealth technology was underway at the time. However, these projects are now well documented. Most...

I totally agree. But some people (with lively imaginations) seem to believe it was some kind of (almost) operational craft, beyond the stage of night flights over White Sands—and that makes it even less plausible, in my opinion. An early-stage...

No, they are assertions. If they are in the data, then I would agree with you. You are pushing Marik's interpretation, your interpretation, and the perceptions and memories of the pilots, as if they are inviolable representations of reality.

The more years pass without any similar technology coming to light, the less probable this hypothesis becomes. Consider also this: there is a long road from fundamental science discoveries to working technology. Along this road, even if it was...

I have no such aerospace knowledge, but I'll point out that if something's secret, the USA has miles and miles of almost empty desert area (White Sands Missile Range alone is bigger than the state of Delaware) and I cannot imagine a developer...

@Mick West , please spend your time refining your model, not arguing in circles. It's not an "explanation". The bumps are proof that the observed fast rotations originate with the camera system and not with the external world. Once the rotation...

No, they are assertions. If they are in the data, then I would agree with you. You are pushing Marik's interpretation, your interpretation, and the perceptions and memories of the pilots, as if they are inviolable representations of reality.

The more years pass without any similar technology coming to light, the less probable this hypothesis becomes. Consider also this: there is a long road from fundamental science discoveries to working technology. Along this road, even if it was...

@Mick West , please spend your time refining your model, not arguing in circles. It's not an "explanation". The bumps are proof that the observed fast rotations originate with the camera system and not with the external world. Once the rotation...