Latest activity

No, Loeb strongly implies that these FBI reports are unexplained. It's not misleading. Loeb is misleading, though. For example, he says, "So I asked them, and they said, well, we have access to everything. And maybe they are not fully aware of...

That was probably the most egregious bit he left in (knowingly, as he admits). Other nonsenses were a kick to the chest leaving the victim's shirt all bloodied, and of course all of the smears of blood on the screens that made no physical sense...

The TLE for the Chinese sat group (based on observation) is in this thread. And it's not going to be 100% but it seems close enough.

Exact position and altitude of the observer effects the exact timing they see it go past a small region of the sky If they and you want it validated to that degree of accuracy then that data needs sharing.

I don't have that specific satellite in Sitrec I meant. I updated all satellites.

This is your sitrec with the QIANFAN TLE loaded and the time scrolled to 20:16:27 UTC

I got it in private so I can't just share it. But there are so many reports saying 21:14 and the stars don't lie I guess

Man I don't know how clearer I can be, where did the data in the sitrec come from, how was it validated?

I don't have that in my Sitrec??

Post one with the actual metadata for time and a location / direction that can be verified. You often seem to lack details when you post stuff give us the data you have for checking.

But it minutes wrong then, and the direction is wrong. It really doesn't add up.

Your expectations for how accurate the sitrec match against stars can be on a predicted sat track without precise observer GPS co-ordinates and height and to the second accurate metadata may need some adjustment.

No, Loeb strongly implies that these FBI reports are unexplained. It's not misleading. Loeb is misleading, though. For example, he says, "So I asked them, and they said, well, we have access to everything. And maybe they are not fully aware of...