Latest activity

Exact position and altitude of the observer effects the exact timing they see it go past a small region of the sky If they and you want it validated to that degree of accuracy then that data needs sharing.

I don't have that specific satellite in Sitrec I meant. I updated all satellites.

This is your sitrec with the QIANFAN TLE loaded and the time scrolled to 20:16:27 UTC

I got it in private so I can't just share it. But there are so many reports saying 21:14 and the stars don't lie I guess

Man I don't know how clearer I can be, where did the data in the sitrec come from, how was it validated?

I don't have that in my Sitrec??

Post one with the actual metadata for time and a location / direction that can be verified. You often seem to lack details when you post stuff give us the data you have for checking.

But it minutes wrong then, and the direction is wrong. It really doesn't add up.

Your expectations for how accurate the sitrec match against stars can be on a predicted sat track without precise observer GPS co-ordinates and height and to the second accurate metadata may need some adjustment.

No, Loeb strongly implies that these FBI reports are unexplained. It's not misleading. Loeb is misleading, though. For example, he says, "So I asked them, and they said, well, we have access to everything. And maybe they are not fully aware of...

The Bledsoe orb has his classic 10 o'clock bokeh line

It strikes me that the problem with this approach of looking for more sky survey-like material shot in the same way with similar technology at the same time is that the analysis is also likely to repeat any flaws in the original papers. That is...

Q: It only takes about a half dozen satellites at GEO to provide 24 hr surveillance of ~90% of the planet. If we are seeing a lot more transients than that, doesn't that strongly suggest aliens are not involved?