There is just no hiding anything from Earth observing satellites. Why would an ultra secret facility risk detection of these hangars? A secreet facility is much easier to create, without any risk of detection from above.
I've tried a bunch of "AI video detectors" online out of curiosity, but truthfully, most of them are only halfway decent with really obvious fakes or deepfakes. When a video is well made or uses a mix of effects, it's a lot harder for both people...
I've tried a bunch of "AI video detectors" online out of curiosity, but truthfully, most of them are only halfway decent with really obvious fakes or deepfakes. When a video is well made or uses a mix of effects, it's a lot harder for both people...
Those "lines" aren't even new discovery, here is 10 year old youtube video talking about them
Source: https://youtu.be/XLP5JQfBzBY?t=91
in short: they don't really look straight like that if you check google maps yourself
But that's the problem. If individual cases are wrong or have bad data, they're not evidence for a trend. Each and every individual case needs to be studied first, then if it's unexplained, it might be evidence for a trend. And a trend doesn't...
But that's the problem. If individual cases are wrong or have bad data, they're not evidence for a trend. Each and every individual case needs to be studied first, then if it's unexplained, it might be evidence for a trend. And a trend doesn't...
As I understand it, there's supposed to be a classified installation in the basement (sub-floors?) below the new wing, so there's at least a tentative connection to national security there.
But that's the problem. If individual cases are wrong or have bad data, they're not evidence for a trend. Each and every individual case needs to be studied first, then if it's unexplained, it might be evidence for a trend. And a trend doesn't...